Snow again...
Jan. 11th, 2008 09:06 amAfter a mild, rainy week, we woke up this morning to freezing rain. In the time it took me to come to work, it went from freezing rain to hail to rather nice fluffy snow.
Not, you understand, that we need any more snow.
We've got it anyway.
Winter in Ottawa is an ongoing adventure.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-12 08:47 pm (UTC)*nodnod* I love having fun with different versions of a muse - that way I can explore the relationship from more aspects. 's good fun!
AAh! lol thanks. Harriet Jones made me bounce and squee - She was SPOT ON!!!
And, um. I mod/co-mod our HP comms, so for administrative purposes I had to grow into 'fishing out' which muses belong to the same player. For the record, I wouldn't have guessed if you hadn't mentioned less-used DW muses - and the common thread I saw was being absolutely in-character. Aaah! *loves* I should get around to doing something about organising myself and having more time for playin'. Not that I don't spend all day on the journals, just...
no subject
Date: 2008-01-12 09:03 pm (UTC)Oh, yes! In particular, I've played Ianto with several Jacks-- and in each one, we've played out a slightly different take on the relationship. And all the Doctors are fun-- especially because I have one 'verse in which Ianto is travelling with Nine.
I'm really pleased to hear that, actually. I adore Harriet Jones and should really let her out some more. I almost didn't have her comment because I haven't played her all that often and was worried I didn't have her characterisation done. I also have an Ainley!Master that I bring out occasionally (though I worry about ICness a lot), a Joan Redfern, Alan Jackson from SJA, a Dalek (really), a Heavenly Host...
no subject
Date: 2008-01-13 12:33 pm (UTC)*nodnod* Tonks has interacted with about four versions of Remus. It's a LOT of fun. Two of them mainly - and there is another Tonks who is playing with both. The more, the merrier. And yeah, all versions are different, although it's really awesome when you get to a point where the two versions actually ... come out similar, on a point that is not settled in canon. Oh the fun!
Harriet Jones - both Reinette and Ten's muns were DELIGHTED when she showed up, I was on AIM with both. <3
*nods* I am not much into Classic!Who yet, so can't say much about Ainley!Master's being IC, but I have no doubt; Joan... I actually kind of hated her in the episodes, which doesn't mean I didn't feel FOR her yet... Odd one. I haven't seen SJA (yet), but there are a few SJ's floating around, I'm sure he'll be welcome. Daleks spook me out (really!) but I'd love to see yours, just so. (Can he make an appearance at the Tammys? ;) ) And HEE! Does that last one react when you snap your fingers at him?
no subject
Date: 2008-01-21 04:48 pm (UTC)I'm delighted to hear you say you hated her in the episodes, because I heard a lot of fans saying how much they loved her, and I didn't like her at all. I thought I was the only one. I did like her relationship with the Doctor, though. (With the Doctor, at the end. Not with John Smith.)
The thing is, Joan was so conventional, so lacking in all the things I love in Martha or Rose - including a sense of adventure - that I found her hard to sympathise with. She was so happy with a mundane life she didn't see other possibilities. And she was so... she loved John Smith, but I thought she patronized him, and she didn't want to see the larger personality that was the Doctor, because in getting to know him, she would have to change and grow, and she didn't want to do that.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-21 05:53 pm (UTC)I think any, any electronic carrier is potentially vulnerable that way. Including e-mails... and, of course, LiveJournal. Even private entries. *shrugs* I've got to trust people someway, I guess?
Heh, yes, I didn't much like Joan at all. And, even though I hated how she purposefully hurt the Doctor, and she knew she was going to, that actually was also made of win, because not all humans can fall before his... overwhelming personality.
But seriously, if there is one character about which I get your point of 'not liking a character because I see too much of me in them, the wrong things'? It's Joan. I absolutely cannot put my finger on why I feel that way either...
But you also have a point, she's taking a passively dominating position with John Smith, and it's... unfair. (On the other hand, he's 3 months old. He's practically a child. ... from her PoV, that makes sense. Alas.)
no subject
Date: 2008-01-21 06:23 pm (UTC)Yes. And truly, I don't believe Google would steal my creative work, or if they did (assuming I was the next J.K. Rowling) international copyright law is on my side. So why does it bother me? Dunno.
any electronic carrier is potentially vulnerable that way. Including e-mails
So true! Yes, better just to trust. And I do. And no problems so far. But we do see odd plagiarism crop up in LJ... I can't think why people would do that.
though I hated how she purposefully hurt the Doctor, and she knew she was going to, that actually was also made of win, because not all humans can fall before his... overwhelming personality.
Yes. And she had reason to resent the Doctor for taking "John Smith" away from her, even though he had every right to do so. I liked her role in the story - just not her personality, as a person. I heard a lot of fans say she was a woman of her time, but I think that's to imply that women of her time were not as clever or adaptable or whatever as we are now - that they were narrow-minded and limited - and that's condescending. As well as not being true.
But that was a great two-part story!
she's taking a passively dominating position with John Smith, and it's... unfair.
I think so. I really didn't like the way he treated her, and the way he acted with her. I didn't think she was good for him, but she was kind to him, so that's something.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-21 04:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-21 04:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-21 05:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-21 04:52 pm (UTC)I do that too. It's handy, and fairly easy to keep track of it all.
it helps to get to know new pups
Could you remind me what a 'pup' is? I keep getting confused by the terms! A mun is a writer, right?
GDocs have a word count
They do? WHere? I've been counting words by cutting and pasting into Word. It would be much easier not to have to do that. Where do I find the GoogleDoc word count?
no subject
Date: 2008-01-21 05:38 pm (UTC)And the word count is in the file menu (when you open the document), the fourth option when you go up from the bottom.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-21 07:03 pm (UTC)Thank you. I was so embarrassed to have to ask you (especially since I think I asked you before) but I couldn't remember. [Blush]
no subject
Date: 2008-01-21 07:05 pm (UTC)The concept I really would have a harder time explaining would be 'meta'.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-21 07:30 pm (UTC)But the word might have all sorts of specialized uses I don't know. Here's what the Open Dictionary has to say:
~ ~ ~
Meta (from Greek: μετά = "after", "beyond", "with"), is a prefix used in English in order to indicate a concept which is an abstraction from another concept, used to complete or add to the latter. The Greek meta is equivalent to the Latin post.
In epistemology, the prefix meta- is used to mean about (its own category). For example, metadata are data about data (who has produced it, when, what format the data are in and so on). Similarly, metamemory in psychology means an individual's knowledge about whether or not they would remember something if they concentrated on recalling it. Furthermore, metaemotion in psychology means an individual's emotion about his/her own basic emotion, or somebody else's basic emotion..
Any subject can be said to have a meta-theory, which is the theoretical consideration of its foundations and methods.
From the Hypercomputing Dictionary: A prefix meaning 'one layer of information removed'. This leads to the interesting extension: If X is some concept then meta-X is "data about or processes operating on X".
This dual directionality, of both being 'background data' or 'processes operating on' can be illustrated when one attempts an 'explanation'. If someone says, "what does that mean?" one can offer them either a definition or an example - either are accepted.
Another, slightly different interpretation of this term is "about" but not "on" (exactly its own category). For example, a grammar is considered as a metalanguage, or a sort of language for describing another language (and not itself). A meta-answer is not a real answer but a reply, such as: "this is not a good question", "I suggest you ask your professor". Here, we have such concepts as meta-reasoning and meta-knowledge.
~ ~ ~
this is from http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/meta
Anyway, fans often use 'meta' to describe their abstract analysis of a character or show, rather than the material strictly within the text (or the show).
no subject
Date: 2008-01-21 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-21 07:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-21 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-21 07:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-21 07:55 pm (UTC)