Penemue...
Dec. 15th, 2006 06:39 pmThis is very cool. The art of writing. I like that. Got it from

Take The Which Fallen Angel Would You Be Quiz
Brought to you by Angel August's Abode
Ironically for an evil angel, Penemue was the curer of stupidity. This seems to go against church doctrines which state that demons are stupid.
However, a demon needs to be intelligent and cunning in order to be able to tempt the wisest of men. He also taught man the bitter and the sweet, and the secret of their wisdom.
Worst of all, he taught the use of ink and paper in writing.
For God had said that human beings were not created for such purposes.
I looked him up: info here.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-16 12:51 am (UTC)*wins*
no subject
Date: 2006-12-16 12:57 am (UTC)I've heard of Azazel; but I can't place where. Somewhere in the writings of Neil Gaiman, I think, probably Sandman. Don't recall ever hearing the name Penemue, which is odd, because, given his province, you'd think I'd have gravitated to him long ago!
no subject
Date: 2006-12-16 10:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 04:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 04:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-16 01:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-16 01:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-16 10:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-17 08:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-16 07:19 am (UTC)Ugly = bad, retarded = bad, unable to talk (stammerers) = bad, one eye that looks left while the other looks straight = bad, and so on, and so on. I have a wonderful and amazing books called Freaks: it chronicles the life of people involved in the "freak shows" of old. Basically, the people who put themselves on exhibit did so from the mindset of being performers; on the other hand, sometimes they were billed as "half-human" or "savage" or even, in one remarkable instance, as "What Is It?" (a man with microcephaly, of African descent, whose name was William Johnston... his act went on for decades, I think he was with either P.T.Barnum or the Ringling Brothers circus, one of these bigger organizations). In the preface to this book, the author recounts a conversation between his young son and a pal, as they all settled down to watch an animated Disney film: the pal asked, "Who are the bad guys?" and the son replied offhandly, "If they look bad, they are bad."
Demons are stupid. Because stupid is bad. And demons are bad. Therefore, demons can have no "good" characteristics. And stupid people, therefore, also cannot be good... because if they were good, why would God have made them stupid in this life? Ugh. These sorts of automatic bits of thinking are what make it difficult to structure a class on disability studies -- so many things "go without saying," and it is hard to bring attention to them without also first dealing with thoughtless assumptions, unconscious assumptions. Points up how fascinating is the human mind, how able to create its own realities in which people want and need to feel comfortable and in control... not so?
Thanks for giving me a neat thought to hook onto!
no subject
Date: 2006-12-16 01:41 pm (UTC)Anyway, I don't think the syllogism is that "demons are bad because they are stupid". It's the other way around, causally: "demons are bad, being bad is stupid, therefore demons are stupid." "Bad" in this case is being defined as "disobedient to the edicts of God" - which are pretty arbitrary and restrictive in this mythology, I think. I wonder how Milton played it. I don't remember.
Nor do I see a value in the reverse notion that "stupidity is a good thing". It isn't.
because if they were good, why would God have made them stupid in this life?
I think the argument is that God made the angels perfect, and therefore intelligent. In rebelling, they chose evil and made themselves stupid, and re-created themselves as less than they could have been. Therefore God did not create demons, they created themselves by following the bad (Lucifer) rather than the good (God).
I'm not sure how much this holds water as a theological argument, though, not being an expert on demonology - just somewhat on the history surrounding them.
I'm not sure whether you are confusing social sciences and myths, or saying that other people do. Either way, I think it's important - if we want a clear vision of reality - not to confuse the two concepts. Myth, psychology, and sociology all overlap but aren't in the least interchangeable.
Points up how fascinating is the human mind, how able to create its own realities in which people want and need to feel comfortable and in control... not so?
Somewhat different with every person, yes. And these demonology treatises cited by Davidson only reflect what was written down in some century when these studies were intellectually popular. I don't think it's 'unconscious assumptions' so much as 'learned assumptions', possibly but not necessarily sublimated.
Thanks for giving me a neat thought to hook onto!
You're welcome!
no subject
Date: 2006-12-16 10:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-17 08:50 pm (UTC)Sure. Words are used fairly loosely but generally 'stupid' is used not to apply to people of impaired intellectual capacity. It's used to apply to people who do things they shouldn't (or who think things that are absurd) when they should know better - making bad decisions, for example.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-16 10:52 am (UTC)but but... in the wikipedia article it was said that Penemue was allso tought to be an alternative name for Kokabel.
Both are teachers ...
no subject
Date: 2006-12-16 12:51 pm (UTC)Let's hear it for Kokobel and Penemuel!
I looked Penemuel up in my Angel book when I was discussing Penemuel with
~ ~ ~
Okay, I got my lazy self over to the bookcase and consulted my best Angel book, A Dictionary of Angels by Gustav Davidson. There is an entry on Penemue on p. 222. It says:
He cures stupidity! We could use a little more of that in this world.
I like the name Penemuel better than Penemue. I assume the latter is pronounced "Pen em you ee" - do you know?
~ ~ ~
So I looked up Kokobel and it says "see Kakabel" and under "Kakabel" (p. 164) Davidson says:
no subject
Date: 2006-12-16 03:24 pm (UTC)WOW thar is something. But I am never good in organizing and taking command. How the hell did I end up in this job!!! And why is the teaching of astronomy taken away from me (as mentioned in the quiz), should we ask the quizmaker for his/her sources?
What I find interesting is that penemuel teaches not just any writing but with ink of paper. Why would that specifically be more evil than on ppapyrus, or in stone or claytablets (al pretty durable, certainly the last two). I could understand if writing in the sand or on waxtablet is tolerated since they don't tend to last. So I guess it must be something else...
no subject
Date: 2006-12-16 06:09 pm (UTC)I;m sure if you have 365,000 lackeys you can delegate one of them to organize the others, and lounge around, above it all.
should we ask the quizmaker for his/her sources?
Yes - the answers would be interesting!
ink of paper. Why would that specifically be more evil than on ppapyrus, or in stone or claytablets
Maybe because it's newfangled? Or because it's too easy - anyone can do it, you don't need many years of training? So the calligrapher hasn't morally earned his role of recorder of things? (Makes me think of Abou Ben Adam!)
no subject
Date: 2006-12-16 10:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-17 08:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-16 10:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-17 05:15 am (UTC)Maybe an angel is just a demon with good PR.
Bringing the art of writing to the world - and fighting stupidity - what could be better?
no subject
Date: 2006-12-17 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 03:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 04:47 pm (UTC)innocenceignorance, humility and meekness deeply dispiriting. There is no virtue in doormat-itude.no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 04:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 07:03 pm (UTC)What's sad is that these ideas, which may arguably have been suitable for a small tribal community, survive to this day.
Annoyed with you all
Date: 2021-02-22 01:37 pm (UTC)