Page Summary
auriaephiala.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rustydog.livejournal.com - (no subject)
judymoe.livejournal.com - (no subject)
flautopiccolo.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sraun - (no subject)
bunsen-h.livejournal.com - (no subject)
iclysdale.livejournal.com - (no subject)
duncanmac.livejournal.com - (no subject)
trixtah.livejournal.com - (no subject)
itsarift-thing.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Active Entries
Style Credit
- Base style: Practicality by
- Theme: Airplane by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2008-10-07 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-07 09:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-10-07 08:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-07 08:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-07 09:00 pm (UTC)On the plus side, I'm going on a series of courses to teach me about Linux, starting in a couple of weeks. I'm not volunteering to act as a Helpdesk, but at least I might improve my geekese so I can actually understand the help fora...
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-10-07 09:44 pm (UTC)(I made up that title, but there are books like that out there in my public library. Mostly specific to certain types of Linux. Ubuntu for dummies.)
no subject
Date: 2008-10-07 08:31 pm (UTC)For those who do, do they still use vi, or just OpenOffice, etc.?
So, why do you ask?
no subject
Date: 2008-10-07 09:52 pm (UTC)Anyway, a friend has taken my old computer, which works fine, and is installing Linux on it so I can give it a try. I was curious about other people's experiences.
What people are saying more or less confirms what I've heard: that Linux isn't intuitively obvious or necessarily easy, and there's a certain learning curve.
If it clarifies anything, I've tried using a Mac, and I pretty much hated it.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-10-07 10:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-10-08 03:36 am (UTC)For newbies, I'd suggest pico rather than vi for simple text files. OpenOffice is the best for documents.
And definitely KDE is an easier windowing system to use than Gnome.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-10-07 08:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-07 09:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-10-07 09:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-07 09:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-07 10:52 pm (UTC)Every month or two, my desktop machine does something sufficiently abnormal or weirdly undesirable that I have to get help from one of the experts, and the problem turns out to be something pretty damn obscure -- that is, only an expert would likely be able to fix it. I can't comment on other versions of Linux, but I wouldn't use this at home.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-08 10:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-07 11:50 pm (UTC)If you want me to bring over a bootable Ubuntu disk sometime I actually make it over, we can load it on your computer, and you can take a look.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-08 10:53 am (UTC)Thank you! But I really don't have a choice here - a friend is installing it on my old computer and the version will be the one he thinks best, which he hasn't told me yet. I could ask him to use Ubuntu, but he probably will anyway.
On the whole, it behaves the way you expect it to
Yay! That's what I want.
If you want me to bring over a bootable Ubuntu disk sometime I actually make it over, we can load it on your computer, and you can take a look.
If you want me to bring over a bootable Ubuntu disk sometime I actually make it over, we can load it on your computer, and you can take a look.
Sure! That would be great.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-08 04:06 am (UTC)I used to use Unix-based stuff for years, but have not done so for a while.
One of my pet peeves with the open-source movement generally is the lack of open-source documentation. A well-known joke reflects this: Real Programmers don't write documentation; if it was hard to write, it should be hard to document (or have *no* documentation). I find this tendency particularly stupid, but (short of joining the Linux Documentation Project myself, which I may do if I *ever* find the time) it's a problem not too likely to be fixed. [It's a commentary that, out of all the programmers in my last job in Vancouver, I was the *only* one willing to ensure that the program documentation was correct, accurate, and actually matched what the program did. Even my boss couldn't write documenting prose; he usually asked me to whip it into shape. :-/]
Plenty of people are willing to write programs, but pitifully few of them are willing to spend time describing (documenting) what they wrote.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-08 04:09 am (UTC)I usually find most dialects of Linux *much* more stable and less resource-hungry than Windows; a five-year-old PC will run almost any version of Linux just fine. [Try doing *that* with Windows Vista!]
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-10-08 11:03 am (UTC)I like the name!
A friend once gave me a few overview-type lessons in Unix. I found it delightfully cryptographic and strange.
Real Programmers don't write documentation
Sigh.
Plenty of people are willing to write programs, but pitifully few of them are willing to spend time describing (documenting) what they wrote.
I think it's a difference in brain function. Those who are good at the kind of conceptualizing (or whatever it is!) that make programming their thing, aren't into writing mundane (or even extraordinary) prose. And people like me, who would enjoy writing the documentation, don't write programs.
You are an exception, having both skills. Be proud!
no subject
Date: 2008-10-08 10:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-08 10:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-10-08 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-08 03:37 pm (UTC)Doesn't always work.