fajrdrako: (Default)
[personal profile] fajrdrako


Another good article: this one about series 2 Torchwood. Now, didn't I make all these points myself a few zillion LJ posts ago?

Especially the 'more sex, please' item. Love the line, "We really need to get back to the good old-fashioned interspecies deviant sex plots." I heard things from Russell T Davies and the BBC that made me suspect they want to make Torchwood more kid-friendly. I hope not.

And more Martha. Oh, yes, yes, yes, more Martha, please! And this time, give her a good dynamic role in the plot.

Date: 2008-09-09 03:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] auriaephiala.livejournal.com
I agree completely: this is supposed to be a more adult show than Doctor Who, and should actually be so. And definitely more action, some interesting new characters, and more Martha!

Date: 2008-09-09 03:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fajrdrako.livejournal.com
I'd hate to think that we might not see Martha again. I hope she joins Torchwood, and travels with the Doctor again, and gets her own UNIT spin-off show.... I don't ask much, do it?

Date: 2008-09-09 03:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] walkingowl.livejournal.com
"More Martha"... echoing other cries about other characters. Does it not sometimes seem as if a great character enters, gets one good storyline, then slips into the background and is catastrophically under-utilized for the next good long while?

Kid-friendly Torchwood. Heh. Funny. "Bland," that means? I read kid-friendly sci fi from the age of seven or eight. I learned about alternative lifestyles and sexualities from it. THAT is "kid-friendly"! Support and encourage open-mindedness and creative free thought, and play around a little in the doing of it. That'd take care of the eight-year-old me just fine.

Date: 2008-09-09 03:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fajrdrako.livejournal.com
Martha was terrific and since they keep using her - i both Doctor Who and Torchwood - I'd like to think we'll see her again. But I don't know. The end of the last episode of DW seemed to sort of imply she might go work at Torchwood, but nothing else has confirmed it. Were they dropping hints, and are now lying low? Or was it a false trail anyway? Or did plans go awry?

Whatever it was, I love Martha and hope to see much more of her.

Date: 2008-09-09 07:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ceindreadh.livejournal.com
I'm thinking that they deliberately left it open as to what Martha and Mickey were going to do next, so as to give TPTB the option of bringing them back for another guest spot.

Remember that DW would have finished filming before S4 started airing. Heck, probably even before Martha's Torchwood eps were aired. My guess is that TPTB didn't want to definitely say that Martha was going to join Torchwood until they'd seen how fans reacted to her TW appearances.
Plus the long gap between filming the respective series, may have meant that they couldn't get a firm committment from FA about the next season.

Personally, while I do like Martha, I didn't enjoy her as much on Torchwood as I'd thought I would. I think it was mainly because her presence took away screentime from the regular characters - specifically Ianto.
Then again, even without Martha, those whole 3 episodes were going to be Owen's episodes.
Anyway, I'm not sorry that she's not going to be on S3.

Date: 2008-09-16 10:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fajrdrako.livejournal.com
I'm thinking that they deliberately left it open as to what Martha and Mickey were going to do next, so as to give TPTB the option of bringing them back for another guest spot.

Yes, and there was Martha, large as life in Torchwood: Lost Souls. I was happy to hear her!

I think they like to leave their options open, which is a good thing. It makes us curious, and speculate, and that's a kind of publicity. It means they can be flexible if they need to be - if Freema Agyeman gets another job, or Noel Clarke, they can adjust accordingly. They have a long history of making it look as if one thing is happening when it's really another.

I can't imagine that they thought Martha would be anything less than a success wherever she appeared. She'd proven herself already.

Martha was sadly wasted in Torchwood - she had some great scenes and moments in "Reset" and then basically had nothing else to do. As a fill-in for Owen, we hardly saw her do as much as Owen normally does. Which sometimes isn't much. We could at least have seen her go Weevil Hunting!

I don't think she took time away from Ianto. It isn't as if he got a lot of screen time when she wasn't there, either. I'd generally rather see Martha than Ianto, but I don't think it works that way, either. We didn't see less of him because we saw more of her... in fact, some of Martha's best Torchwood scenes were with Ianto.

I'm betting she'll be in series 4.

Or maybe not. A lot can happen between now and then.

Date: 2008-09-10 03:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] walkingowl.livejournal.com
I love Martha, too. Great character! I'm wondering: is this the Doctor Who pattern? A new character shares his adventures for a while, then leaves, pfft? Bummer, if so.

I actually think that nobody really knows what they want to do with Torchwood, and so they are right now not really doing anything! Just jump in and swim, people, yes?

Date: 2008-09-10 03:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fajrdrako.livejournal.com
is this the Doctor Who pattern? A new character shares his adventures for a while, then leaves, pfft?

Yeah, that seems to be it. Or, rather, a new character shares his adventures for a while, and then is forced to leave. (None of them have left voluntarily. Well, Martha went sort-of voluntarily, but only as making the best of a difficult situation.)

Torchwood is going fine - the new radio play is on today! I'm looking forward to it. They know what they're doing, they just haven't told us yet.

Me, I want Martha back.

Date: 2008-09-09 07:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ceindreadh.livejournal.com
I have to disagree with some of that article, specifically the comment about FA/Martha being the one to 'carry the middle part of the season'. If anybody 'carried' any part of the season, it was Owen and his 3 episode "i'm dead, no i'm not, well maybe I am" arc. And while I think BG is probably the best actor on the show, I wish they'd spread the focus around a bit.
The problem with bringing a new character onto a 5 character show is that somebody is going to lose out in terms of screentime, and (unsurprizingly) Ianto was the one to suffer. (although I'll forgive TPTB a lot for including that 'dabbling' scene ;-)

As for making Torchwood more kid-friendly. I doubt it. The show is still going to be being broadcast in a 9pm slot. That's post-watershed. TPTB are not going to waste a post-watershed slot on a kiddie show. Now if they'd said they were going to air it at 7 or 8 pm, then I'd be worried.

Date: 2008-09-10 03:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fajrdrako.livejournal.com
If anybody 'carried' any part of the season, it was Owen

Sadly, Martha was wasted in two episodes out of the three.

while I think BG is probably the best actor on the show, I wish they'd spread the focus around a bit.

I agree that Burn Gorman is a good actor, but I still don't like Owen much, and was bored by most of his series-two themes. Not that I don't find Owen interesting - especially in series 1 - but I liked all the other characters more.

The problem with bringing a new character onto a 5 character show is that somebody is going to lose out in terms of screentime, and (unsurprizingly) Ianto was the one to suffer.

I don't think so. I agree that Ianto should get more screen time! But it isn't a matter of 'who else is in the episode'. The episodes that had fewest characters, like "Random Shoes" and "A Day in the Death" still hardly featured Ianto, so it isn't as if they use him to fill spaces.

(although I'll forgive TPTB a lot for including that 'dabbling' scene ;-)


Great moments in Torchwood!

Soo-prize, Soo-prize, Soo-prize!

Date: 2008-09-10 02:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] walkingowl.livejournal.com
Hey, uh, you might be interested to know that there is an advertisement in the left margin right beside this nifty post of yours... it's an image of a person's profile and the words TOM CRUISE 25 YEARS VISIT THE SITE.

Snicker.

And Again...

Date: 2008-09-10 03:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] walkingowl.livejournal.com
Now it's an ad for the University of Phoenix online. Hee.

Date: 2008-09-10 03:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] walkingowl.livejournal.com
And now it's for a site selling FaceBook lay-outs.

Okay, I'll quit now [g].

Date: 2008-09-10 03:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fajrdrako.livejournal.com
it's for a site selling FaceBook lay-outs.

You lost me. What is?

Date: 2008-09-10 03:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fajrdrako.livejournal.com
Oh, wait, now I see. I was reading your posts backwards. Why do the ads amuse you?

Date: 2008-09-13 04:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] walkingowl.livejournal.com
Why do the ads amuse you?

'Cuz.

I was reading your posts backwards.

Hee. That amused me, too.

Profile

fajrdrako: (Default)
fajrdrako

October 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
151617181920 21
22 232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 24th, 2026 05:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios