(no subject)
Aug. 15th, 2008 09:20 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Tennant ... has no difficulty in making the transition from the BBC's Time Lord to a man who could be bounded in a nutshell and count himself a king of infinite space.I'd never thought of the Doctor in the TARDIS as "a king of infinite space", but now I think of it, I can't imagine a better description of him.
Ever since Tennant became the Tenth Doctor, I've thought he had a good dollop of Hamlet in him: clever, mercurial, eloquent, suicidal. I wonder how the Doctor got along with his mother, and whether he had an uncle. Or a stepfather.
I'm tired of the condescension shown to SF in these articles, though, as if Tennant and Stewart have never done Shakespeare before, or as if Star Trek and Doctor Who fans are too déclassé for such highfalutin Tudor drama - as if they don't really want the riffraff wandering about the premises.
It's all storytelling, and one of the great virtues of Shakespeare is that he was never a snob. So why do the people producing his plays become so patronizing?
no subject
Date: 2008-08-15 02:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-15 02:59 pm (UTC)I adore that play.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-15 11:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-16 12:23 am (UTC)And he was wonderful.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-16 12:34 am (UTC)I want you to tell ALL about this production!
no subject
Date: 2008-08-16 11:05 am (UTC)