I'm a wreck...
Sep. 26th, 2007 09:45 amI'm a wreck because of allergies. Ugh! I'm not sure if it's simple allergies or allergies plus candidiasis - probably both. I could hardly to anything last night but sleep. I did manage to watch some TV, mindlessly, with
Then
If I hadn't been half asleep I'd have gone home then, but as it was, I stayed for an episode of Coronation Street, catching up a little - I haven't watched a whole episode in years. They were celebrating New Year's Eve, which shows you how far behind the CBC is on new episodes.
Then I went home, and slept soundly, and never wanted to get up. It was rainy and humid and I felt more tired than ever. Treated myself to a major breakfast from Nate's. Did it help me to wake up...? Not much. I feel out of sorts and grumpy.
At least I wasn't rained on, like yesterday.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-26 02:24 pm (UTC)I think that thing you watched with maaboroshi wasn't Life on Mars but a ghastly movie called Mars Attacks or Attack from Mars, or something like that.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-26 02:40 pm (UTC)You're right, it was Mars Attacks, I can't even think clearly eough to remember that this morning. Aaaargh!
Grump grump grump.
But that's a really beautiful icon you have there.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-26 05:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-26 05:24 pm (UTC)I wanna sleep some more....
no subject
Date: 2007-09-26 06:28 pm (UTC)I think the secret with CBC and Coronation Street is is that they are actually ahead, Canadian spies raided the BBC vaults and took a year's worth of Coronation Street. Due to the repetitive nature no one has yet found out.
(disclaimer, I've never even watched any episode of Coronation Street and I don't know what I am talking about)
Hope you feel better soon
no subject
Date: 2007-09-26 06:59 pm (UTC)I like your theory about Coronation Street and the CBC! Time warp - or perhaps I should say, timey-wimey stuff.
Not watching Coronation Street is probably good for your sanity. It's about a bunch of people who mess up each other's lives endlessly - and their own at the same time.
Thanks for the good health wishes. I hope you're having a good health day!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-26 09:08 pm (UTC)From the History Channel programmes I have seen (recorded by friends for me) I am inclined to agree that they are hideously dumbed-down in comparison with what BBC 2 used to do in the halcyon days of my youth. Thankfully, I now have a stash of decent DVDs, such as Kenneth Clark's Civilisation, Jacob Bronowski's The Ascent of Man, Francesco da Mosta's Francesco's Italy, and Brian Sewell's jaunts to Compostela and the Grand Tour.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-27 01:21 pm (UTC)On the whole, the History Channel has some of the worst television I've ever seen. Occasionally it rises to the amusing. Mostly it confuses history with trivia (and vice versa) and has never heard of historiography, sources, reasoned argument, or cause and effect. Lots of feeble recreations of old battles in which it doesn't look as if anyone is trying very hard to kill anyone else.
Though I admit, the pictures and details of the Roman ballista in that show were interesting.
I never saw or heard of Francesco's Italy - it sounds like something I absolutely must see!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-27 06:47 pm (UTC)Yes! It did a nice episode on the 12C Renaissance.
On the whole, the History Channel has some of the worst television I've ever seen. Occasionally it rises to the amusing. Mostly it confuses history with trivia (and vice versa) and has never heard of historiography, sources, reasoned argument, or cause and effect. Lots of feeble recreations of old battles in which it doesn't look as if anyone is trying very hard to kill anyone else.
Sadly, some of the terrestrial channels here are buying in History Channel programmes here. There's far too much reliance on hokey re-enactments, instead of serious discussion. They also tend to present things as unequivocal, not representing disagreement between historians in interpretation.
I never saw or heard of Francesco's Italy - it sounds like something I absolutely must see!
Your wish is my command… Will see what I can do!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-27 07:33 pm (UTC)That program I was watching presented the revelation that Maiden Castle had ramparts as if that were extraordinary - not didn't bother to explain what they meant in any case.
There is a certain charm to seeing computer graphics fill in the 'artistic representation' of what a place or structure might have looked like at one time... But they should remember that this is no more than an 'artistic representation'. And if it is more than that, they should explain why, and how, and how they know.
On the other hand, I got excited when they showed the interior of Maes Howe. I always do. I can't help it. "I've been there!" I chirped and
no subject
Date: 2007-09-26 09:35 pm (UTC)Oh those History Channel shows! They seem to get their writers out of the tabloid papers...!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-27 01:10 pm (UTC)Hope you feel better soon!
Yes, that show on Stonehenge - it had a tabloid-like sensationalism with absolutely no content at all, least of all new ideas or information. I hate what I call the Von Daniken school of journalism, where the content is all innuendo and questions, usually beginning, "Could it be that...?" And no evidence whatsoever! Least of all any sense of history.
But I did enjoy the pretty pictures.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-28 05:27 pm (UTC)Isn't that the truth! "Could it be that zebras can fly?" "Could it be that aliens ate the brains of the producers?" You can come up with any sort of nonsense and if you phrase it as a question you can escape all the hard issues, like evidence and credibility.
Good luck!
Glad you're feeling better! The weather has been so reversed in California this year. Our rainy season is usually in the spring - this year, not a drop. It never rains in the fall - it's been raining and on for a week. I'm sure that's why my allergies are flaring up. September is usually my most allergy-free month.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-28 05:42 pm (UTC)We might possibly have self-evidential proof of that one! Unless possibly they had no brains to be eaten in the first place.
Yes, my allergies seem to have disappeared today. I am happy! And for a change, I have some energy!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-26 10:54 pm (UTC)I've watched about two minutes of Coronation Street in my time. Can't say as I get it, but that's probably just me. I do remember one time in a hostel in the Lake District walking into the lounge one evening only to find a crowd of people all glued to the television and when I asked what was on, got a whole bunch of shushing and one whisper of "Coronation Street."
no subject
Date: 2007-09-26 11:50 pm (UTC)My mother used to watch Coronation Street decades ago. I therefore have a sort of fond familiarity with it, all the more in that
no subject
Date: 2007-09-27 02:40 am (UTC)My only attempt in that direction involved a summer of watching All My Children when I was in high school, some 30-odd years ago. I never will understand the appeal, I'm afraid (says the woman who is addicted to Grey's Anatomy [g]).
no subject
Date: 2007-09-27 12:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-28 01:42 am (UTC)I think it's got a lot to do with what one looks for in entertainment. Me, if I like the people (if the characters are Real People [tm]), they've got me, pretty much from the getgo. Series tend to do that sort of thing better than single volumes, of any media.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-28 01:52 pm (UTC)Oh, absolutely. I love series. In general. Especially when the characters are particuarly entertaining, or heroic. Miles fits perfectly!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-27 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-27 03:48 pm (UTC)It is, isn't it?
Maybe that's part of its magic, that created its devoted following. You know how they used to talk about subliminal images in film for advertising. Maybe this is ... subliminal audio.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-28 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-28 05:35 pm (UTC)*hugs back*