What mythological creature am I...?
Mar. 15th, 2007 12:00 pmSurely not! I mean - I'm an introvert. Mostly. Sort of. A sociable introvert. This really doesn't sound like me.
| You Are a Chimera |
![]() You are very outgoing and well connected to many people. Incredibly devoted to your family and friends, you find purpose in nurturing others. You are rarely alone, and you do best in the company of others. You are incredibly expressive, and people are sometimes overwhelmed by your strong emotions. |
I got this from

no subject
Date: 2007-03-15 04:17 pm (UTC)I'm just realising again just how shy I really am... I think the LMB list (and LJ) are actually a good influence on me. :) Me, I'm an introvert all the way.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-15 04:33 pm (UTC)If a chimera is a mixed-up sort of paradoxical person... With strengths and weaknesses that contradict each other - maybe!
I like to think the LMB list and LJ are good for me but that may just be self-indulgence coming into play, because I enjoy them so much.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-15 04:20 pm (UTC)Also, that description doesn't work either as this thing is said to spit fire and killed everyone in the city of Lycia. It was killed by Bellerophon as he rode Pegasus.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-15 04:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-15 04:34 pm (UTC)Hmm.
Dryad. I love trees.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-15 04:33 pm (UTC)That fits nicely with the name "fajrdrako".
But I have nothing against Lycia.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-15 04:35 pm (UTC)I think.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-15 04:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-15 04:49 pm (UTC)If the hoof fits, wear it.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 12:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-15 04:48 pm (UTC)I'm struggling for the image...
no subject
Date: 2007-03-15 04:26 pm (UTC)As for overwhelmed by my strong emotions, that might wel be right ;-) (emoticon of a weak and socially acceptable emotion)
no subject
Date: 2007-03-15 04:37 pm (UTC)Me too. Though I like people, I'd say I'm more of a solitary type: my favourite activities are all solitary - reading, studying, writing. I watch TV as a group activity, usually.
Yes, being overwhelmed (or overpowered, or obsessed) by my own emotions is a problem. I try not to let it show.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 08:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 11:34 am (UTC)This doesn't stop me from thinking of myself as solitary and introverted, though!
no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 12:12 pm (UTC)I hoped to get more involved with the History Dept here in Glasgow, but last term it was always dark and stormy and raining when there was a talk on (at 5.30), which made going out again an unpleasant prospect; and this term, there aren't any subjects that interest me (all Modern).
no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 12:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 02:14 pm (UTC)Apparently, some 2nd year Mediævalists, as part of a social history course, have been asked to create a"character profile" of a fictional character (their tutor gives them the social class and occupation and they have to use their reading to flesh it out). They then have to write a paper about how their fictional character would react/what s/he would think, feel and do, during the 13C popular revolt they're studying... To me, this is a creative writing exercise – historical fiction, not history! Apparently, their tutor thinks this will give "meaning" to their research. Also, it's because some of the demographic groups covered (such as the unemployed) haven't left much trace in evidence. Fine: if there's not much evidence, that doesn't give you carte-blanche to impose your own imaginative recreation instead: you should just come clean and say, "We can't say what x demographic group thought about these events, because we have no proof"!
I was horrified. We never, ever had to do anything like that at St Andrews.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 02:20 pm (UTC)Hee - I wouldn't know, I'm a graduate of Carleton!
We never, ever had to do anything like that at St Andrews.
Well, we never had to do anything like that at Carleton, either, but of course that was eons ago... Yes, it does sound like creative writing and I can see it as an exercise to get psychologicallly into the medieval environment, but I'd want lots of justification and footnotes and sources for just about every assertion. Easy to wander off into assumptions.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 02:29 pm (UTC)I think that there is a great majority of people in the world who need this sort of exercise to bring history to a personal level they can relate to. History to a lot of people is drab - dates, names, events.[...]
I see this as a way to get the younger kids in class interested in the social structure of medieval life in a new way. It brings the facts to life. Causes them to have to think about the research in a more personal level. I know from experience, that this can be incredibly useful.
As I pointed out, these "younger kids" are not 8 year olds: they are 2nd year undergraduates of 19 or so. They shouldn't need sweeteners of this kind. And if they are finding the subject "drab", why the hell are they doing it? They chose to study it. And if the staff want to bring the research to a personal level for them to "relate to", there are documented real people to study, such as those with whom we fell in love...
no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 03:07 pm (UTC)I can see this as being more appropriate for an exam, with the student proving how much he has learned about the reality of the situation. And again, with lots and lots of references and citations.
Handy for parking...
Date: 2007-03-15 05:42 pm (UTC)Re: Handy for parking...
Date: 2007-03-15 05:50 pm (UTC)Re: Handy for parking...
Date: 2007-03-16 08:01 am (UTC)I think it's just "flying horse". Pegasus was its personal name, wasn't it?
Re: Handy for parking...
Date: 2007-03-16 11:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-15 10:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-15 10:50 pm (UTC)Love your icon!
no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 02:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 02:17 pm (UTC)