I think my concerns as a reader and my concerns as a writer are generally quite different - though the sound of the words is always important. When I read other people's works, not knowing the meaning beforehand (so to speak), understanding seems more important. But the sound always matters, and affects my understanding. This is why I find manuals and text books so difficult to read.
This is why I find manuals and text books so difficult to read.
Oooh they may be nightmarish... Some authors achieve some sense of humour, and those are easier to work on...
Me, I can despair of a book where the word-sound is good, but the contents bore me (little or no characterization, no-good plot...) I do need some substance to underline the form, really.
Gah. This reminds me I'm falling behind on my tw_exchange story again. *headdesk*
Yes - perfectly clear language that makes no sense to me at all, sometimes! I do much better with poetry.
Some authors achieve some sense of humour, and those are easier to work on...
This is why I like the "for Dummies" series. Some are terrible but the good ones are terrific.
I do need some substance to underline the form, really.
Well, I do too, and ideally there is a balance. But when I write, word-sound is more important and the action takes care of itself. Usually. This can, of course, be a problem.
This reminds me I'm falling behind on my tw_exchange story again.
Lately I have failed every challenge or exchange thing I've tried. I want to join in, but... I just don't manage to do it.
How true - I have to fiddle with a sentence to make sure it flows correctly when I'm writing. If the words are just in a slightly different order, it won't feel right.
I love reading authors who can evoke a lot with just a few words rather than those who use many, but I think that is just personal preference.
Some writers handle brevity very well - others are better when they use a lot of words. I think it depends on the subject or the individual style - or maybe it's just that I don't have a lot of preference either way.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 01:52 pm (UTC)But, as a reader, I like to have some... thing for the words to be about, as well. Usually. *grins*
no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 01:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 02:01 pm (UTC)Oooh they may be nightmarish... Some authors achieve some sense of humour, and those are easier to work on...
Me, I can despair of a book where the word-sound is good, but the contents bore me (little or no characterization, no-good plot...) I do need some substance to underline the form, really.
Gah. This reminds me I'm falling behind on my tw_exchange story again. *headdesk*
no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 02:12 pm (UTC)Yes - perfectly clear language that makes no sense to me at all, sometimes! I do much better with poetry.
Some authors achieve some sense of humour, and those are easier to work on...
This is why I like the "for Dummies" series. Some are terrible but the good ones are terrific.
I do need some substance to underline the form, really.
Well, I do too, and ideally there is a balance. But when I write, word-sound is more important and the action takes care of itself. Usually. This can, of course, be a problem.
This reminds me I'm falling behind on my tw_exchange story again.
Lately I have failed every challenge or exchange thing I've tried. I want to join in, but... I just don't manage to do it.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 02:37 pm (UTC)I love reading authors who can evoke a lot with just a few words rather than those who use many, but I think that is just personal preference.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 03:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 03:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 04:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 10:58 am (UTC)