The Grand Canyon...
Jan. 8th, 2007 01:39 pmCan I believe what I read? This article must be an April Fool's joke. No? Especially:
Grand Canyon National Park is not permitted to give an official estimate of the geologic age of its principal feature, due to pressure from Bush administration appointees.... "In order to avoid offending religious fundamentalists, our National Park Service is under orders to suspend its belief in geology," stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch. "It is disconcerting that the official position of a national park as to the geologic age of the Grand Canyon is 'no comment.'"
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 06:44 pm (UTC)It really _must_ be a joke.
A bad one, at that!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 07:24 pm (UTC)Really not funny.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 06:45 pm (UTC)We're a democracy, no? Or was it a theocracy?
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 07:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:United States of Jesus
Date: 2007-01-08 06:59 pm (UTC)I weep for my country.
Re: United States of Jesus
Date: 2007-01-08 07:27 pm (UTC)Re: United States of Jesus
From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 07:05 pm (UTC)See, this is why I find myself more and more hesitant to publically identify as a Christian - because as soon as people hear it, they think you're a fucking quack!
*sighs*
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 07:20 pm (UTC)There are just degrees of it: from the almost sane and pretty benign through to the totally barking. As with all religions.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 07:30 pm (UTC)Yeah. I feel for you. It's a strange position to be in. And it's the kind of thing that makes a person like me find it more and more difficult to be sympathetic to even the most intelligent, rational, tolerant and reasonable Christians, because the other kind are making such fools of themselves.
I always wonder why anyone would worry about 'not offending' people who are simply wrong.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 07:21 pm (UTC)They should go ahead and offend them! They're wrong!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 07:32 pm (UTC)So why doesn't the Bush administration worry about offending us?
That was meant to be rhetorical question.
Grump.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 07:27 pm (UTC)a. Satire - what they believe will happen, if things go on
b. True - and mightily scary
c. Someone's idea of a bit of fun - and not.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 07:34 pm (UTC)Sometimes I want a new planet. We're all supposed to be civilized and intelligent, right?
Okay, maybe not.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 11:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-09 02:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-09 12:32 am (UTC)Unfortunately, fanatics and fundamentalists are everywhere. It really doesn't matter what religion they follow, as I noted in this journal entry (http://duncanmac.livejournal.com/2816.html) of mine.
It becomes particularly entertaining when people at opposite extremes of this debate also happen to be relatives. Relatively speaking, that is part of why I don't talk much to most of them [though laziness plays a role too :-(].
no subject
Date: 2007-01-09 02:47 pm (UTC)I can't help wondering how it could come to this - the biggest, most powerful country on earth being governed by the stupidest people in it.
Christian fanatics are annoying but as far as I know they don't murder, maim and oppress others the way some other fundamentalists do - they haven't the power. Yet. (I remember the text of The Handmaid's Tale with a shudder.)
As for relatives - that's not something we get to control!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-09 03:41 am (UTC)*headdesk*
no subject
Date: 2007-01-09 03:42 am (UTC)I think I'll blame my bad spelling on US/FL education while I'm at it. :\
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-09 12:37 pm (UTC)You'd be welcome! I used to say the only thing really wrong with this country was the weather, but that's changed. Since this winter is so mild, we don't even have anything to complain about. Canadian conversation has ground to a halt: what can we say all winter, if we can't complain about the weather?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 07:25 pm (UTC)I hope it is. It's seriously scary otherwise.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-17 07:34 pm (UTC)