(no subject)
Oct. 19th, 2006 09:19 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Think of this as a postscript to my entry about Time's list of books that I wrote yesterday.
I looked this morning at the Time list of movies. ALL-TIME 100. I'd seen less than a quarter of them - twenty-four and a third, actually. And I think I see a lot of movies. But I've seen very few old movies - by which I mean, movies that came out before I was old enough to see them - which means I haven't seen much that came out before 1970 or so. My parents didn't encourage movie-going. I have friends who were given a quarter every Saturday afternoon and sent to the movies, but that never happened to me; nor did I ever watch movies on television. So I haven't seen most of the 'old classics' that this list is full of.
And the "third of a movie" is because I've seen The Godfather, Part 1 but not parts 2 and 3, and the list puts them all together as one item. Fair enough.
Most of the movies they list that I've seen, I didn't much like, though I acknowledge their quality.
They do list three of my favourite movies of all time: Casablanca, Lord of the Rings, and Lawrence of Arabia.
I suppose I could use this as a guide of what to watch, but truthfully, I'm not impressed enough with it to do that. There are to many on the list that I didn't like, and some I didn't go to see because I didn't want to see them. Others (Bonnie and Clyde, Goodellas, Pulp Fiction, even maybe Brazil) went beyond my personal tolerance-level for violence.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-19 01:57 pm (UTC)I don't think I've seen any of the five that were the readers' top rated :<}.
I heartily agree with your three.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-19 02:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-19 02:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-19 03:30 pm (UTC)Of course it is good. It is brilliant. But it isn't the kind of movie that makes it way onto lists created by corporations.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-19 02:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-19 02:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-19 02:27 pm (UTC)It also has _some_ level of violence, including, as far as I can recall:
(somewhat spoilerish)
a mother cutting out her son's sixth digit
a man committing a suicide
disruptions about Japan's conquering of China
disruptions and cruelty about China becoming a communist country
no subject
Date: 2006-10-19 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-19 05:48 pm (UTC)Must find time.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-19 02:16 pm (UTC)Casablanca truly is great--saw a bit of it a week or so again, gosh it's good.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-19 02:21 pm (UTC)Opps, sorry, I meant to put in the URL. (Done now.) It's at:
http://www.time.com/time/2005/100movies/the_complete_list.html
Do tell me which of the old movies I should be making a point of seeing!
I love Casablanca in so many ways. Rick is one of my favourite heroes ever. And it never gets stale.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-19 03:25 pm (UTC)There's one I haven't seen--the crime of Monsieur Lange. There are also unaccountable lacunae--there's a film made, oh, about '56, after the Czech Revolution, that was utterly terrific. One of the best i've ever seen. But damned if I can ever remember the title.
Anyway, most of those are worth seeing (I also thought King Kong pretty stupid) at least once. And if it's before, oh, 1960, it won't be hideous violence like a lot of those others.
I'm also surprised not to see Prisoner of Zenda in there, Ronald Colman, which is many ways is a perfect film--even film buffs will say so, though they do tend to have a penchant for some pretty odd stuff.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-19 03:34 pm (UTC)I think the idea of King Kong is pretty stupid and haven't even forced myself yet to watch the Peter Jackson version, even though I like Peter Jackson's work and the actors in it. (Some of them.)
no subject
Date: 2006-10-19 03:40 pm (UTC)I don't know what Monsiuer Lange is about--I'd never heard of it till I saw it on this list.
I hope I can get back that film title...I'll ask my daughter the film student, but I don't know if she'll remember--she is cursed with a visual memory similar to mine. I believe Yul Brenner and Deborah Kerr were the stars, but I could be mistaken about that...I can see their faces, but I have severe name dyslexia along with everything else. Blurp. Blurp. "And I can hide my own Easter Eggs!"
no subject
Date: 2006-10-19 03:48 pm (UTC)Curiosity may drive me to look up some of those movies just because I'm intrigued as to why they were chosen.
I find that metaphorical movies often miss the mark.