Casanova...
Aug. 14th, 2006 10:42 pmThis evening I watched the final episode of Casanova, the 2005 BBC3 mini-series starring David Tennant, Peter O'Toole, Shaun Parkes and Rose Byrne. I had never heard of Rose Byrne; I watched because of those first three.
Who am I kidding? I watched because I love costume drama (or costume romantic comedy, or whatever) and I would have watched this even if I'd never heard of any of the actors. It's the third filmed version of Casanova's life that I've seen, and I've liked them all.
The frame story reminded me of Quills, where a young female servant develops an interest in the aging Marquis de Sade because he keeps her fascinated, Shahrazade-style, by his stories. The old Casanova (Peter O'Toole) is not a prisoner, except perhaps in a self-imposed way, keeping himself to himself in the disrespected role of librarian in an out-of-the way castle, telling the story of his life, bit by bit, evening after evening, to a fascinated serving girl who keeps coming back to see how the suspense and the romance unfolds.
Yes, romance. As in the recent movie with Heath Ledger, the story of the famous philanderer is transformed into a story of unquenchable true love. In a way, I find that twisted and amusing: should the story of Casanova not be one of freedom and individuality? In another way, I enjoy the irony itself, and I enjoy the way it's a comment on our times, in which womanizing becomes a sort of metaphor for true love.
And, surprisingly, does so successfully.
Now, in this version, I didn't like Casanova's true love, Henriette, played by Laura Fraser. She seemed unappealing to me: primarily a trickster, hiding behind words, showing little warmth or humanity. I much preferred Bellino, the castrato singer who turns out to be a woman - maybe because she was played by Nina Sosanya, who is gorgeous.
A lot of the strength of the production was in the wonderfully expressive performance of David Tennant. He gave the role charm and grace. Who could not love this vivid, life-loving, woman-loving man?
I didn't like the costuming by Michele Clapton. It wasn't true to period, it wasn't generally attractive, and it specialized in being dramatically outrageous. It wasn't a surreal story: it didn't need bizarre and anachronistic costuming. (Even though some of it was eye-catching.)
The cinematography, however, was gorgeous. And the script by Russell T. Davies was witty, amusing and nicely suspenseful. I was eager for more of the story, just like Edith.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 08:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 11:24 am (UTC)Yes, and I can't think why - it isn't as if 18th century clothing was boring or drab by any standards! I suspect they thought that a modern audience would prefer a visual style that was outre-but-recognizable in comparison to fashion to day. Or something.
And since they had actors who would look good in anything at all, it worked.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 11:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 12:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 01:38 pm (UTC)You know, I simply cannot find men in modern dress attractive. A friend and I at university once thought of launching a "Real Men Wear Lace" campaign to deal with this, as we were disgusted at the fact one very handsome boy - a Prince Rupert lookalike - habitually went around in a scruffy t-shirt and faded jeans which did not look right on him at all. We wanted to enforce a 17-18C dress-code...
no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 02:50 pm (UTC)But generally, men's clothes for the past 180 years or so have been mostly unimpressive.
Real Men should wear lace. I agree.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 02:59 pm (UTC)Embriodery is always good, too. Cloaks with metal clasps. Leather.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 03:03 pm (UTC)This icon says it all. I would have liked to remind my boy to wear his whenever he went out of the house!
no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 04:06 pm (UTC)The costumes in Kingdom of Heaven were feeble and unimaginative in comparison. Well, actually... there is no comparison.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 04:30 pm (UTC)KoH was very strange... in so many respects.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 11:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 12:30 pm (UTC)Why not? I don't generally like Heath Ledger - at least, not after Roar - but I thought that version of Casanova was very funny.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 01:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 02:18 pm (UTC)A Knight's Tale was similarly annoying since I like Rufus Sewell (who was not at his best there anyway) and had to settle for concentrating on James Purfoy because all the other characters were giving me a headache.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 02:53 pm (UTC)Please check out some of my fanfic on fanfiction.net: I write as Doc M
There was too little Rufus and too much silliness in Knight's Tale.
(Am currently battling on IMDb in defence of the lovely C... There's a Richard-groupie about. I grieve...)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 03:02 pm (UTC)And thank goodness for him! More execrable history - or at least, pointless historification.
Okay, I'll look for your Doc M fanfic.
too much silliness
And my silliness-tolerance level isn't very high.
Am currently battling on IMDb in defence of the lovely C...
Fight the good fight!
There's a Richard-groupie about. I grieve...
I love Richard too, but I feel no need to attack Conrad on his behalf!
no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 03:09 pm (UTC)Doc M's Fanfic (http://www.fanfiction.net/u/79389/)
I have an unfortunate tendency to leave things unfinished.
I love Richard too, but I feel no need to attack Conrad on his behalf!
This was someone blaming Conrad for Richard not capturing Jerusalem, because he wouldn't risk leaving Tyre to join him on his campaign south. Given that he suspected that Richard wanted to take Tyre to give it to Guy, that wasn't unreasonable.
Poor lad, I wish I could just give him a hug sometimes.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 04:02 pm (UTC)This was someone blaming Conrad for Richard not capturing Jerusalem
Ah, well, we know Conrad gets blamed for everything. He's probably also responsible for War, Famine, Death and Pestilence. Historical hindsight is a marvellous thing. Conrad was responsible for Tyre, Conrad took responsiblity for Tyre - just as he should have. And as sovereign king (however tenuously) playing toady to Richard's wishes was the last thing he should have done.
I wish I could just give him a hug sometimes
My dear: you don't need a reason to hug Conrad. (and there are too many potential reasons anyway.) Just do it when you feel like it!
no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 04:26 pm (UTC)Yes, it's truly remarkable... It's almost as if someone has taped a sign to his back, saying "It's all my fault, whatever it is. Kick me."
He's probably also responsible for War, Famine, Death and Pestilence.
As far as Ambroise and the Itinerarium are concerned, he certainly is! It's all his fault there was famine and disease in the camp at Acre, because he didn't send supplies there after he'd taken his bride home. Never mind the fact that hardly anyone was taking to the sea in December and January, and the ships that did sail either got wrecked on the rocks or captured by the enemy... They probably blame him for the weather!
My dear: you don't need a reason to hug Conrad. (and there are too many potential reasons anyway.)
Being intelligent, well-educated, cultured, heroic, handsome, and meets all my h/c requirements... Hmmm...
Just do it when you feel like it!
Indeed! He gets lots of virtual cuddles from me - gentle ones, obviously, as I wouldn't want to hurt his side.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 04:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 06:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 10:07 pm (UTC)*eyes fall out of her head* I knew about DT, but.... but... but... but... but... PETER O'TOOLE? AND DAVID TENNANT? AND PETER O'TOOLE? AND DAVID TENNANT? AND PETER O'TOO-- *head explodes*
no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 10:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 11:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-21 01:54 pm (UTC)...Like, for instance, that cool icon.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-16 04:40 am (UTC)But yeah, Casanova. David is amazing, no?
Mind you, Chris is still my favorite doctor.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-16 11:17 am (UTC)I agree David is amazing. I agree that Chris is my favourite Doctor. He was just... as good as it gets.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-16 06:48 am (UTC)David was brilliant in it, but Henriette was an impossible part: she had to love him and leave him, and it would take a genius actor and script both to pull that off.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-16 11:15 am (UTC)Yes, and we actually saw very little of her. Nonetheless, I felt that her dialogue was distancing rather than endearing or amusing - probably deliberately, but I would have liked a little more connection to her. The only part where I liked her was when she got a nurse for Casanova after her husband shot him....
I was left thinking that Casanova, with his hopeless love for her, was a bit of a glutton for punishement. Which was okay: he was utterly endearing and fun to watch.