(no subject)
Jun. 25th, 2006 10:47 pmI took this from
Reply to this entry with your name and post these instructions in your own journal. I will go poke around your list of interests on your profile and ask you one question about one of them. You wax rhapsodic on the subject of your interest for the edification of all and we'll learn something keen about you.
Or in simple terms:
Reply to this meme, I'll pick one of your interests, and you tell me a whole bunch of stuff about it and we all learn a bit more.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-26 03:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-26 03:40 am (UTC)But we haven't (as far as I recall) talked about classical music, which I love too. So what types of classical music and what composers do you like? How did you get into it in the first place? Do you have good CDs of favourite music?
I realize that the instructions say I will ask one question. I am aware that this is more than one question. Answer as many as you wish.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-26 05:00 pm (UTC)Classical music! I got into it because I played violin since I was 11. Orchestra was an integral part of my life growing up. I pretty much lived it from elementary to graduation from high school.
I had a conductor who thought we were the DSO and made us play all kinds of professional pieces. It was stressful because... we were high schoolers, not professionals, but it was challenging and turned out great concerts and we got some training from the DSO so it turned into a self-esteem boasting experience!
I also met most of my friends that way.
I like pretty much anything classical. Favorite composers are probably Mozart and Saint-Saens and Tchaikovsky. :D
no subject
Date: 2006-06-26 05:33 pm (UTC)Violin - ! Wow. I am impressed. I have an eleven-year-old friend who plays the violin and I'm impressed by her, too.
I also like Mozart and Saint-Saens and Tchailovsky. I'm still not sure about Wagner. Love Bach.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-26 10:04 pm (UTC)Part of me wishes I had learned cello. So in Eden, I made him the violinist but made his mother a cellist. I can live vicariously through her then.
One of my favorite pieces of music is by Vaughn-Williams, called Fantasia on a Theme by Thomas Tallis. I played it at a memorial concert and it still rips my heart out with its beauty. I recommend it.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 01:23 pm (UTC)I will look for your Vaughn-Williams piece.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-26 04:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-26 11:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-26 06:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-26 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-26 05:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-26 11:13 am (UTC)But you have some items that mightily intrigue me and some I don't know what they are. And I can only ask about one thing, right? (This doesn't mean I won't store up other questions for later!) Okay, tell me about your interest in Marxism, and what it means to you.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-26 03:09 pm (UTC)Once I got off on my own, at University, I looked around for like-minded students, and discovered SDS. Through my activities with this student group I developed an interest in socialism. I read fairly widely, Proudhon, Bakunin, Kropotkin, the IWW writers like Big Bill Haywood, the anarchosyndicalists, and then took a class from Associate Professor Ken Megill, on the philosophy of Marxism ... we read Marx and Engels, Karl Kautsky, Lenin, Luxemburg, Stalin, and Trotsky.
The point that Marx and his followers agreed on was that real egalitarianism could only happen if the material basis of society, the development of the means of production, was sufficiently advanced to support it. Only with the industrialisation of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries has that happened. And at the same time, that industrialisation has produced an economic class capable of absorbing all other classes into itself - the working class.
When I came to Canada in 1968 to avoid the draft, I looked around for a political group I could agree with. I fell in with Bob S. and Ross F., joined the Labor Action Committee, and then the New Democratic Party.
For me, Marxism is the historical analysis of the politicoeconomic history of humanity, a way to understand the world, but that is only its starting point. "The philosophers have sought to understand the world; the point, however, is to change it." My own point of view is that the single most important focus of political action for a Marxist in the twenty-first century is the struggle for the political independence of the working class. I'm in the NDP to fight to keep that independence. My closest political friends in the US are involved in the struggle to build an independent Labor Party. My old comrades in Europe are organising against the European Union, the World Social Forum, and other capitalist initiatives, for a "Europe of the workers," with all the working-class social gains of the last 150 years preserved, not eroded away.
My Marxism is political analysis, political action. "The point, however, is to change it."
no subject
Date: 2006-06-26 03:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-26 04:04 pm (UTC)I must admit, however, that my ex-wife resembles her more than a little.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 08:12 pm (UTC)Today, at random, I went to an entry in my LJ from two years ago, and what did I find? A quote from Rosa Luxemburg.
It was downright disorienting.
http://fajrdrako.livejournal.com/2003/12/11/
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-26 09:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-26 11:07 am (UTC)So tell me about Nikolai Ge.
Nikolai Nikolaevich Ge (1831-94)
Date: 2006-06-26 12:23 pm (UTC)His father was descended from French emigrés - the name was probably Gué originally.
He studied art in Kiev, then went to the Academy of Arts in St Petersburg, where he began to establish himself as a painter of Classical subjects. Then he won a scholarship to Italy, and his career took off. He became a good friend of Herzen, the exiled philosopher. He started reading about the historical Jesus, and studying Italian art. Caravaggio became an influence, and in 1863 he exhibited a superbly moody Last Supper (http://center.rusmuseum.ru/InetBookNew/images/ge_taina.jpg). The same year, he became supportive of the young artists who were wanting to break with the Academy of Arts. In 1871, he exhibited with the new Society for Travelling Art Exhibitions, which had evolved out of the secession from the academy. Making use of the new railways, they exhibited in major provincial cities and attracted the patronage of the nouveau-riche industrialists and merchants (much as the Pre-Raphaelites did in the UK). The painting he exhibited in the 1871 exhibition is one of my all-time favourites:
Peter I interrogates Tsarevich Aleksei Petrovich at Peterhof. It caused a sensation, as only in recent years had historians been able to write more honestly about the abuse and judicial murder of Aleksei by his father: before 1854, officially, he "died of a stroke" while imprisoned in the Peter & Paul Fortress on treason charges; in reality, he had died of over 40 strokes of the knout (when already dying of tuberculosis), with Daddy going to watch... There was a massive controversy over whose side Ge was on. A clue is that the composition was influenced by Honthorst's Christ before Caiaphas.
Ge later became a close friend of Tolstoi (http://imagesource.art.com/images/-/--B11721158.jpeg), sharing his philosophical ideas, and as a result painted some magnificent religious works, including Golgotha (http://www.ku.edu/~russcult/culture/visual_index/peredvizhniki/39ge_golgotha_1893.jpg) and 2 versions of the Crucifixion (http://www-relg-studies.scu.edu/facstaff/murphy/courses/images/coursepics/chr-011.jpg). However, the most memorable is "What is Truth?" - Christ and Pilate (http://artrussia.ru/pic_g/g075_400.jpg), which not only harks back to the confrontation between smug tyranny and battered humanity in Peter and Aleksei, but almost certainly influenced the portrayal of its 2 characters in a novel by his fellow Ukrainian, Mikhail Bulgakov: in The Master & Margarita, Yeshua and Pilate are described pretty much as Ge depicts them.
Re: Nikolai Nikolaevich Ge (1831-94)
Date: 2006-06-26 02:02 pm (UTC)Re: Nikolai Nikolaevich Ge (1831-94)
Date: 2006-06-26 02:55 pm (UTC)Apart from the 2 Crucifixions (one in Paris, one in Geneva), his best work is in Russia and Ukraine. I saw quite a bit of it in Moscow and P'burg. I did a chapter on the Peter and Aleksei painting in my doctoral thesis, but no-one wanted to publish it... (And yes, poor Alyoshen'ka - with his bad nerves, which made him drink, and his bad lungs that made him use cherry-coloured silk handkerchiefs, is one of 'my boys', although at 28 he's more in the "honorary adoptive child" category. Too pretty and delicate to be flogged to death.)
Re: Nikolai Nikolaevich Ge (1831-94)
From:Re: Aleksei (1690-1718)
From:Re: Aleksei (1690-1718)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-26 11:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 01:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-27 11:39 pm (UTC)The Three Investigator are boys (their ages are never stated, but somewhere between 12 and 14 or so) who live in a small town just outside Los Angeles. One summer they form a detective agency, and have all sorts of interesting adventures solving intriguing mysteries.
I think what I like most about the characters is that they're all somewhat social misfits. The leader, Jupiter Jones, is described as 'stocky' by his friends and 'fat' by not-so-friendly folks. He's brilliant but overly serious. He's an orphan who lives with his aunt and uncle (who own a junk yard, and where the boys have created a secret headquarters hidden among the junk). The 'muscle' is Pete Crenshaw, jockish and not always bright but with a heart of gold. And Bob Andrews is the bookish one with a part-time job at the library, so he does any research they need.
It's a child's series, so it can get rather formulaic, and it's somewhat dated now, since the books were written in the sixties-seventies, but I had loads of fun reading them (and still own the series - all but two of the books, which I haven't been able to find yet. I re-read my favourites from time to time).
no subject
Date: 2006-06-28 12:30 am (UTC)