(no subject)
Apr. 27th, 2006 02:17 pmLife and art doing an amusing dance together: Judge creates own Da Vinci code.
Now, I'm not an admirer of The Da Vinci Code, or even of Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, but I admire the playful spirit behind them. And how often to we see a sense of humour in the law?
no subject
Date: 2006-04-27 11:30 pm (UTC)I liked the Da Vinci Code, mostly for the mystery aspect. Not fabulous writing nor deep characters. It was a fun read.
I don't understand all the hype/freaking out about it though.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-27 11:36 pm (UTC)The only puzzle I miffed was one where I thought they were going after Sir Christopher Wren and it turned out to be Sir Isaac Newton - or vice versa, I forget now.
It did have its moments. I liked the mad albino monk assassin and the Opus Dei thing.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-27 11:42 pm (UTC)It didn't annoy me. The proclamation that any of this was history annoyed me a bit. I read it soon after visiting the Louvre so it had its romantic draw for me, post travels.
But I thought it was fun. *shrug*
no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 12:02 am (UTC)I love the Louvre too, of course, but I was there much longer ago and my memories of it are less intense. Another beautiful place.
Seems to me we ought to have had a scene in Malta!
no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 12:33 am (UTC)I liked the picture book version, where they show photos of various places mentioned. That was fun.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 01:13 am (UTC)