"Write Better, Write Now!"
Sep. 9th, 2003 12:42 pmI'm one of those people who like to read books about English usage, grammar, word origins, and so on - anything about words and how they go together. It occurred to me at lunchtime that it was a while since I'd read a new book of that type, so I got one out of the library, Write Better, Right Now! Fast, Easy, Effective Writing Tips and Grammar Rules for Canadians by Paul Paquet and Laura Byrne Paquet.
It's for Canadians, I thought - good thing. Usually the English usage books I read are by Americans or the British, and I have to translate accordingly. It's good to occasionally read something about my native language and its uses.
After some reading, I was amused and pleased to find familiar Ottawa references in the examples - something about a parking space on Bank Street, something else mentioning Carleton University. I checked out the address of the publisher: yes, it was published in Ottawa. And the e-mail address looked oddly familiar for some reason, and I checked the author's name again, and discovered that the co-author was someone I know: someone I just saw last Sunday, as a matter of fact.
Small world. But I met her in a writers' group, so it makes sense.
The book has some good quotes, like this one from Stephen Leacock:
- Writing is no trouble; you just jot down ideas as they occur to you. The jotting is simplicity itself - it is the occurring which is difficult.
Now, I don't actually believe that - the jotting can be difficult. I still think it's a good quote.
There is an interesting paragraph that speaks volumes: "Remember that, unlike the case in the United States, there are roughly as many people of Asian ancestry in Canada as there are people of African ancestry, and roughly as many Moslems as there are Jews. And our great divide tends to be linguistic rather than racial. If you want to reflect diversity, make sure that you're reflecting Canada's diversity, not America's."
It seems to me that only in Canada would such a paragraph need to be included - since we are so surrounded by American culture that we have to be reminded that that their reality is not our reality, and to be told what our own reality is.
I would add too: if you are writing for an American audience, or an international audience, the Canadian demographics may be irrelevant.
They also quote Chaucer:
Speaketh so plain at this time, I you pray,
That we may understand what you say.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 10:17 am (UTC)Oh, and though no one seems to take it into account, diversity in the US varies quite a bit depending on where you are. My neck of the woods, there's a little bit of everything. Go to Idaho, and it's a whole different mix. I'm sure that this is true for a lot of countries. But of course, the US is one homogeneous, overbearing, cultural
holewhole...no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 06:04 pm (UTC)I think homogeneity is against human nature, really.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 11:33 am (UTC)And see, I completely and totally disagree with that. The occurring is the easiest, most simple part of my writing. It's constant. I am always having ideas occurring to me. It takes no work to make things occur - in fact, it takes work not to.
However the 'jotting down' is hard. It's hard to make the words match the complete whole that exists in my head, it's hard work to concentrate that long, it's hard work to keep things coherent, it's hard work just to type (let alone handwrite) the 4,000+ words that my longer 'short' stories tend to be (leaving alone my WIPs, which are tens of thousands of words . . .)
Not to mention the revisions and the rewrites and so forth and so on . . .
no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 06:13 pm (UTC)But at the same time I know all writers are different and to some the occurring is difficult, the writing (and rewriting) is hard.
Usually the idea and the writing of the idea aren't all that different in my brain; sometimes ideas come to me in indivisible chunks of 5,000 words. It's like the medium being the message - the words are the idea, and vice versa. Or sometimes it's a visual image, or a theme.
And I always have many, many more ideas than I have time to write them. Or polish them. Or post them.
That's okay. I wouldn't want to think I was running out of them, either. It's nice to have a backlog. (Some for fandoms I haven't written in, in years.)
no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 03:25 pm (UTC)We were just discussing this in class today. A black woman in my writing class who was raised in Toronto explained how she can't connect to blacks on American tv; I'm not sure whether it was the culture or the stereotypes she was talking about, but she feels American tv can't really speak to Canadians.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 06:23 pm (UTC)Yes, I find American culture quite different in a lot of ways, particularly its inclusion of black and Hispanic culture, which really doesn't translate to our Canadian experience - or the language used to describe it - even for those who are black or Hispanic Canadians.
I think American TV can and does speak to Canadians - why else would we be enthralled by Smallvile or Buffy or Stargate-SG1? But I think also we're at a remove from so many things that Americans (and therefore American TV shows) take for granted as 'reality', and that gives us a cognitive dissonance that is sometimes confusing, sometimes just amusing.