Supernatural: Men and Angels...

[fajrdrako]

Once again I spent the evening watching Supernatural with explodedteabag. I'm enjoying it immensely, despite having to close my eyes occasionally for the gore. I'm still particularly enjoying the bits where Castiel appears....

And by a delightful though eerie chance, as I was watching episode 4x10, "Heaven and Hell", I got a phone call from a friend to tell me about the book she was reading about Angels. She knew nothing about Supernatural, not even that the show exists, let alone that I was watching it. I almost asked her if the book had anything about Castiel in it, but I suspect not. As angels go, he's fairly obscure.

This show is so reminding me of some comics I love. Misha Collins even has the John Constantine stance down pat. And the gaze. And the rumpled coat. explodedteabag wants to know: how can you get your trench coat that rumpled in heaven?

I'm also starting to like Sam and Dean, not just for their clever dialogue, but as individuals.

Comments

[fajrdrako.livejournal.com]

I am trying to get my hands on earlier seasons, even though they don't feature Castiel. But I'm intrigued and intersting. As you know, I love broken heroes.

And yes, I've already looked at the straightness as problematical. Not that I haven't encountered this in TV often enough before, but it still isn't my favourite thing, and I have in recent years become so utterly spoiled with the fluid sexualities of Torchwood.

[kikibug13.livejournal.com]

Oh they are good. In three seasons there are about two episodes that I consider unworthy. Spn is good TV, and just you wait till you reach 4x16; that's a brilliant, brilliant episode. And yes. Oh yes. And Sam and Dean both are. And Castiel seems to be turning into one too.

Heh. Maybe, but it's consistent with the way they were raised. John seems to have been a bit of a Bible Belt kind of person, and after what happened he was extremely, extremely focused. That said, the straightness is also done with a remarkable lack of homophobia, at least from my perception, and I like that. (And, you you know. Fluid sexuality is one thing. Incest is different.)

[fajrdrako.livejournal.com]

Do you think I should continue watching season 4, or go back to season 1? My inclination is to watch season 4 up to the current episode (so I can at least participate in current discussions of the show) and then will in by going back to the beginning.

John - you mean John Winchester?

Yeah, I too like a lack of homophobia, though I'm not always sure how to define it, or how to know it when I see it.

[kikibug13.livejournal.com]

I'd say, if you have s4 available, watch it through. And then when you are caught up with the first three seasons, watch s4 again. You will, I promise you, see a lot more when you know much more of the backstory. They are doing an amazing job of making sure new watchers can follow the story and at the same time there are references and layers that are comprehensible only if you've watched the earlier stuff. So yeah. Up to you. I'm... very very happy that I succumbed to watching it. I literally ran through the first three seasons in two weeks (besides work) in September together with kittydesade - she has the Sam to my Dean - and... yeah. There are inescapably episodes which are a little weaker, but the show hasn't disappointed me yet.

Yes, John Winchester, the boys' dad. Which episodes have you seen so far?

Heh. The only (sexuality-related) eww so far has been incest (both parent-child and siblings) and it's pretty clear. The rest, well. The boys are living in our century.

[fajrdrako.livejournal.com]

I've seen season 4, episodes 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10. The first five minutes of season 1 episode 1 (when it aired). And a showing of season 3 episode 1 at a video-party, where it didn't make much of an impression.

So I've barely seen John Winchester but I loved the actor in The Watchmen, where he was such a complex personality.

So far I like the way the show has handled sex, considering that it's all het. (That I've noticed, anyway.)

Yes, I think that's what I'll do - catch up on season 4 and then go back to season 1 and watch it all in order.

[kikibug13.livejournal.com]

Heh. So you know where John started from. Something that the boys didn't know at all. And... hmm. 3x01 makes a great deal more impression when one knows about Dean's deal and how it came about and what happened in ... most of s2 actually. S3 actually has no downer episodes, even if some (Jus in Bello) are hard for me to watch. S1 ep that may be a downer (not all of it, just the ending) is Bugs; S2 is Nightshifter. S4 is Family Remains (11) so be forewarned - but also you can see what low quality for this show means, and I know that's still higher quality than a lot of tv series eps.

Yes. Some of the charges leveled against Spn is that it's sexist (as in biased against women), although I'm ... that sort of thing hasn't irked me sufficiently to notice it? (Okay, it has its share of bitchy female characters. It also has a good share of bastards; and even the boys are no angels. Hey, even the angels are no angels! Dicks.) So... yeah. I just like it. >.>

Hee :D