Books into movies...
Mar. 15th, 2009 09:57 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)

I think my favourite series should be made into movies, or perhaps well-made miniseries:
- The Lymond Chronicles by Dorothy Dunnett. Well-nigh impossible, probably, because what actor could ever adequately portray Lymond? On the other hand, I never thought anyone could adequately portray Aragorn son of Arathorn till I saw Viggo Mortensen in the role. These things can be done.
- These Old Shades by Georgette Heyer. I'd like to cast Johnny Depp as the Duke of Avon - not that he is anything like my mental image of Avon, but wouldn't he gorgeous? And camp? And dangerous?
Alternately, I'd like to see just about Any Georgette Heyer novel as a movie, done with the skill and care they've given to Jane Austen in the past. No, not the one with Keira Knightly - something true to the period. - The Vorkosigan series by Lois McMaster Bujold. Again, finding someone who could adequately portray Miles Vorkosigan would be a challenge, but not impossible. Given today's technology, I think David Tennant could do it.
- Karin Lowachee's series about pirates, orphan boys and the battleship Macedon that starts with Warchild. Space opera with a psychological twist. Difficult because much of the action is interior (and with suspect narrators at that); but what gorgeous results we might get.
- Guards! Guards! by Terry Pratchett, because I want to see Sam Vimes onscreen.
- Megan Whalen Turner's series about Gen that starts with The Thief. Difficult because the writing is so devious, but... colourful, exciting, beautiful.
- An artful remake of Prince of Foxes by Samuel Shellabarger, or any of his books.
For the second part of the question: I wouldn't stop anyone from making anything into a movie. There are lots of movies I wouldn't - and won't - go to see, including a rather high proportion of the ones that do get made. No big deal.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 02:44 am (UTC)I want to see the Amelia Peabody books on film, too. And I have most of the casting down pat for that one, too [g].
no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 12:13 pm (UTC)And he doesn't even have a son. There must be someone else there like him....
No. Maybe not.
I want to see the Amelia Peabody books on film, too.
That would be good!
I have most of the casting down pat for that one, too [g].
So - ? Share!
no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 05:58 pm (UTC)Ioan Gruffudd for the adult Ramses, and Kate Winslet for the adult Nefret.
Amelia still stymies me. Emma Thompson would be brilliant so far as personality, acting ability, etc., go, but she doesn't look enough like her. Other than that I can't think of anyone.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-18 01:29 pm (UTC)I'm having fun picturing that.
Kate Winslet for the adult Nefret.
Nice. I've never been much of a Kate Winslet fan (holding a grudge for Titanic) but I'm coming to like her.
Emma Thompson would be brilliant so far as personality, acting ability, etc., go, but she doesn't look enough like her.
I like Emma Thompson a lot. Hmm.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-18 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-18 06:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 03:06 am (UTC)But i think Hugh Laurie said something once about writing the script for it.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 12:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 04:26 am (UTC)Can't you see him lounging in the coach on the way to the party? I can.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 12:14 pm (UTC)I would love to see both. Either one.
Can't you see him lounging in the coach on the way to the party?
Perfectly!
no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 04:52 am (UTC)The first movie would be like 14 hours long though because it chronicles about 200 years of the past family ties.
But it would be so worth it.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 12:15 pm (UTC)That would be... interesting. A good director. If they cast it right. Yes.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 07:22 am (UTC)Short stories need some padding, and sometimes it shows. Novella length is perfect. Unfortunately, this isn't a very popular length for published work.
So I would say that there isn't a single book that I would want to see filmed.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 12:28 pm (UTC)Yes. Sometimes we have to postulate a series of movies, like with The Lord of the Rings. A cut-down version of Dunnett would be unthinkable.
I've never seen a really satisfactory film version of a book,
I have, but it's rare.
though if one has the elbow-room of a television series, it can be another matter - the (I think joint British/Australian) version of "The Day of the Triffids" is excellent.
I haven't seen that, but I've seen some good miniseries based on books. Jane Eyre is an example - it made several terrible movies, but at least one very good miniseries.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 10:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-18 01:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-18 06:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-18 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-19 07:07 pm (UTC)Helen: Was it very bad?
[Hugh doesn't answer; his expression is hard to read in the darkness of the car]
Helen: Well, you're back now.
Hugh: Am I? Sometimes I wonder…
no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 12:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 09:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 01:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 06:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-18 07:01 pm (UTC)– Well, I would have been very upset if they'd stuck to the book with The Hireling. Do not kill off the eye-candy is one of my tenets.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-18 08:16 pm (UTC)Except for Veidt, Silhouette and her girlfriend were my favourite characters in the movie.
Do not kill off the eye-candy is one of my tenets.
I approve of that - Watchmen should have listened.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-19 06:50 pm (UTC)Mind, it's a superhero movie… Maybe it was staged, so they could go undercover? There's always a get-out clause in films of this kind!
no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 12:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 10:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 01:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 10:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-18 01:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-18 06:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-18 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-19 06:48 pm (UTC)(BTW: on that time-period, have you seen my thread on the purported Shakespeare portrait? I thought it might appeal to you!)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 12:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 01:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 12:09 pm (UTC)Shudder. Not at all.
But I like your ideas about casting.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 04:31 am (UTC)Heh. Thank you.
Gina Torres was on an episode of La Femme Nikita about ten years ago, playing a totally unscrupulous sort who enjoyed torturing people in a certain interesting semi-participatory way. She was magnificent. Also in the episode was the singer/entertainer who had fronted a band called Adam and the Ants -- he left the band and called himself Adam Ant. This episode was filmed less than a year before I saw in the news that he had been taken into custody for his own protection, after behaving weirdly at a pub somewhere, including disrobing in front of people as if he didn't see them there. His character in the episode was totally unlikeable. But it was a good episode, pretty indicative of what the series strove to achieve. Someday, I'll get them all on DVD. (First, Doctor Who fourth season....)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:09 pm (UTC)I have mixed feelings about La Femme Nikita. Saw an episode or two and thought they were good, but I have such reservations about the premise (a woman being forced to do something, rather than choosing to do it) that I don't much like it.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-28 03:56 am (UTC)I was captivated by the character named Michael. As the seasons progressed, the actor (Roy Dupuis) turned his character into something elegant and dangerous, and on top of that he was physically delicious. He ended up having a very odd way of delivering dialogue: at the end of something he said, he'd drop his jaw a little tiny bit, thus opening his mouth for no real apparent reason at all. And he did it all the time. Every time he spoke. And he walked like someone trained in ballet; and he ended up wearing only tights-like trousers or leggings. All very, very subtle, never calling the audience's attention to it.
Apart from that, I was deeply in crush over one of the two people in charge, Madeline. She was ... very scary. But lovely. And so in balance.
Yeah. Weird show. I also hated their very premise: an invisible organization that fights terrorism by using the terrorists' own methods. Ugh! how repulsive. But the character interplay... mesmerizing.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-28 02:11 pm (UTC)Okay, now you make it sound like fun. [g] Maybe I'll try watching it again. Others are trying to get me to watch Supernatural, if I can get over the squicky bits.
Lots of people were captivated by Michael, if he was the one played by Roy Dupuis. Wonderful actor.
an invisible organization that fights terrorism by using the terrorists' own methods. Ugh! how repulsive.
Scary and repulsive but oddly plausible. After all, it's what we've seen happening.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 05:04 am (UTC)Yes, that was Michael to whom I referred. He was leonine.
Scary, repulsive, plausible... but it never works, in real life.