Solomon Kane
Jan. 10th, 2009 10:15 pmWe then proceeded to create delicate mayhem, and I do think a good time was had by all. Helped, in
At one point a nurse asked, "Is this the room with the party?"
We managed to go online1 and I discovered that they are making a Solomon Kane movie. How had I missed that?
And - I think I gasped aloud - Kane is played by James Purfoy. I done died an' gone to heaven.
Solomon Kane is my favourite of the Robert E. Howard heroes.2 Remember when there were Solomon Kane stories in Marvel Premiere with art by John Buscema? I thought Kane was sexy, because he was so dark and repressed - sexy in the way 17th century Jesuits were, or certain English Puritans. I wonder if I'll feel the same about him in the movie.
Here's a nice pic I found of him by Mike Grell. Here is a drawing of Kane in an uncharacteristically heroic pose. Here's a fair-haired, bearded Kane. And - ooh - this, from the movie. Gorgeous!
Found an item about the movie by its writer/producer, Michael Bassett. It's hard to judge the quality from his comments - but the notion that it's 'character driven' is good. There seem to be no trailers yet, though. I wonder why not.
And I never knew this, The Solomon Kane Sketchbook, existed. Seems to be out of print. Damn.
~ ~ ~
1 By "we" I mean
2 Unless you count Red Sonja as drawn by Barry Windor-Smith.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-11 05:33 am (UTC)Cool! Yes indeed, I remember those Marvel Premieres. Dark and repressed really does it for me. I hope they do a good job with the movie.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-11 02:36 pm (UTC)Me too. He had just the right balance. When I excitedly told
"Robert E. Howard's other hero," I said. "The one who isn't Conan."
"Kull?" said
"His other other hero," I said.
I guess Solomon Kane is a little more obscure.
I hope they do a good job with the movie.
Yes. My only fear is because the 'look' reminds me a little of Van Helsing, which had looked promising. And it sounds as if they rewrote/embellished the character a little - that could be good or bad. We'll know when we see it!
no subject
Date: 2009-01-12 03:18 am (UTC)Yes, I think so.....! Boy, this takes me back.
>>>
Van Helsing definitely "looked" promising. Parts of it were actually OK to watch. Mostly sizzle, no steak.
This could be very interesting - I hope they do a good job with it.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-12 03:56 am (UTC)Sadly disappointing. It did have its moments, particulary visually. And what a good cast! But lacking in tension and substance.
Not that Robert E. Howard is usually very substantial. But he should have something - a sense of drama, danger both physical and psychological, intensity of situation.
I live in hope.
And after all: James Purefoy.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-12 04:00 am (UTC)It was one of those movies which make pretty wallpaper.
<<<
no subject
Date: 2009-01-12 12:41 pm (UTC)So true. Even David Wenham looked good, despite his odd role. High Jackman and Kate Beckinsale always look great, but I wish they'd choose their movies more carefully.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 02:44 am (UTC)Van Helsing
Date: 2009-01-13 12:33 pm (UTC)Didn't we all! At first,
no subject
Date: 2009-01-11 12:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-11 02:18 pm (UTC)That is so true. Even in the relative resourcelessness of a hospital room, she can do wonders.
Please send our best wishes for maaseru's speedy recovery.
Will do!
no subject
Date: 2009-01-11 04:14 pm (UTC)And a belated happy new year to you! *g*
no subject
Date: 2009-01-11 04:37 pm (UTC)I will relay your good wishes to
Happy new year to you, too.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-11 06:48 pm (UTC)When is she coming home, do you know?
C
no subject
Date: 2009-01-12 12:34 am (UTC)She is feelings fine. Really, the change is amazing. She's not in pain, she's moving around, she's even walking to the bathroom (with her walker) without assistance. We are impressed.
She isn't even hooked up to tubes and wires any more. She and
no subject
Date: 2009-01-12 11:33 pm (UTC)This concept does my head in… Jesuits and Puritans sexy?! Aaaaargh!
no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 01:42 am (UTC)