They sent an inexperienced boy, I don't know if they wanted him to fail or not, but that was their bad, and we do not trust nor like the council.
Maybe it's politics. Maybe it's something more sinister. Maybe it's meant as an insult to Giles: that he should be replaced by someone without experience or guile.
I can only tell you that Wesley is one of the ones that really deserve a place in your heart.
This is good to hear. And as of the end of season 3, I like the character a lot - have come to respect him, though not yet to love him.
also the writing, the stories, the show. You'll get there.
Good! And truthfully, I did quite like the first episode; I particularly liked Angel, even without Buffy. (And the hints that he was hurting because of his love for her were icing on the cake.) I could have done without Cordelia, who grated on me even more in the context of Angel than she ever did as Buffy.
What have you learned so far about Joss and stuttered beginnings?
Sigh. Enough to be procrastinating a little on the beginning of season 4.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-11 12:20 pm (UTC)Maybe it's politics. Maybe it's something more sinister. Maybe it's meant as an insult to Giles: that he should be replaced by someone without experience or guile.
I can only tell you that Wesley is one of the ones that really deserve a place in your heart.
This is good to hear. And as of the end of season 3, I like the character a lot - have come to respect him, though not yet to love him.
also the writing, the stories, the show. You'll get there.
Good! And truthfully, I did quite like the first episode; I particularly liked Angel, even without Buffy. (And the hints that he was hurting because of his love for her were icing on the cake.) I could have done without Cordelia, who grated on me even more in the context of Angel than she ever did as Buffy.
What have you learned so far about Joss and stuttered beginnings?
Sigh. Enough to be procrastinating a little on the beginning of season 4.