Nine photos...
May. 19th, 2007 08:14 pmAs I've been meaning to for a long time, I took some photos of my neighbourhood this evening. It was a beautiful sunny day, with trees in flower and tulips in bloom; but I had a lazy afternoon and didn't get around to taking photos until after 7:30, so the light was no longer good. Mea culpa. Hope you enjoy them anyway.
The first two pictures were taken inside the apartment. The others are all within a block of my door, or less.
1. My new budgies, Jubilee and Peter.
2. Logan, so he wouldn't be left out of the photo session.
3. A tree on the street.
4. The tulips by the duck pond.
5. The Rideau Canal.
6. My apartment building, as seen from the duck pond.
7. My building, from another angle.
8. The path I start out on when walking to work in the morning. You see why I like to walk to work?
9. The duck pond on a quiet Saturday evening in May.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-20 12:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-20 12:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-20 12:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-20 12:56 am (UTC)Though it's really true that the Glebe in springtime is spectacular.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-20 12:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-20 12:59 am (UTC)I'm hoping to take more pictures than I have been. I've fallen out of the habit, but it really is a good thing to do.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-20 01:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-20 01:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-20 01:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-20 01:26 am (UTC)I once knew a few words and phrases in Cree but I've forgotten them, unfortunately.
Heck, these days even my French is rusty.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-20 02:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-20 02:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-20 03:28 am (UTC)I wish you were on the way to Stratford. I'd visit when I go (aiming for week of August 13th...)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-20 03:58 am (UTC)Ooh, Stratford! I'm planning and hoping to go this summer, but I don't yet know when. What will you be seeing?
no subject
Date: 2007-05-20 04:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-20 10:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-20 11:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-20 11:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-20 01:22 pm (UTC)I love the ones with the waters - #5 and especially #9
Another thought
Date: 2007-05-20 01:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-20 02:14 pm (UTC)Re: Another thought
Date: 2007-05-20 02:37 pm (UTC)And, in their way, not as handy as they might be, especially the big ones with the box stores, where the bus stop is always some distance away (beyond the always-humungous, always-filled parking lots) and the distance between stores, or even within stores, necessitates a major hike.
I suppose I should look on it as 'extra exercise'.
Re: Another thought
Date: 2007-05-20 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-20 05:51 pm (UTC)I think birds in general love to pose. This afternoon, I was watching a cock chaffinch in a hawthorn tree - a sweet little guy with a dusky pink front. He was cheeping loudly and posing very prettily.
Re: Another thought
Date: 2007-05-20 06:12 pm (UTC)And I don't think people should be encouraged to (a) drive or (b) buy stuff. But that's the way of the world.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-20 11:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-21 12:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 05:23 pm (UTC)He does, doesn't he? Such a cutie. It was fun when he was side by side with Pryde, the rotund budgie. Mutt and Jeff? Maybe more like a bowling pin and a bowling ball.
the new guys are very bright!
That they are - in both colouring and personality.
I was watching a cock chaffinch in a hawthorn tree - a sweet little guy with a dusky pink front.
So beautiful! I've been looking at the birds lately as I walk - mostly sparrows, starlings, crows, and other non-colourful things, but all lovely in their own ways. There was a group of starlings snacking on someone's lawn, their heads bobbing up and down, and I couldn't help thinking, "Pick a little, talk a little" from The Music Man.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 08:11 pm (UTC)Starlings are delightful little guys: all iridescent, like oil on water, and speckly, and cheeky, with a wonderful walk!
I was back over in St As today (library books to be renewed, and lunch with Lisa and Jane), and spent a while watching a group of 5-6 crows pestering 2 old ladies (who were eating pasties or bridies while sitting on a bench in the square near the church) for pastry crumbs. The crows were mugging shamelessly, dancing around being cute. They are very intelligent and characterful birds, with comical facial expressions. As the sun gleamed off their feathers, they looked quite handsomely iridescent, too: blue-black heads and purple-black bodies.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 10:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 10:45 pm (UTC)Well, maybe not with my cheap little camera. But I could try.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-23 08:41 pm (UTC)(And if I could ever steal time to be able to just think, I could of course figure out how to send you the photos I took of Logan -- I'll try to work on that!)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-23 08:51 pm (UTC)Well, to each her own, but speaking both as a photographer and as someone who has sensory sensitivity issues, late-day light is quite desirable at times, and these photos showed no lacks, to my eyes. The diffuse, indirect daylight lends mood and avoids glare. If you think some of them were a little dark in places, lacking some detail in shadowy areas, then that's the lack of your camera -- a manual SLR or otherwise film-using camera could be made to avoid that small imperfection, with practice.
I liked all these photos. Colors suffused them in a delightfully understated way. Also, nice memories. Thanks for posting them.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-24 03:19 am (UTC)I don't really want to put a lot of time and effort into photography anyway, but it's fun to play with.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-24 03:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 11:06 pm (UTC)Every budgie needs a hobby. Some even have their own websites, I imagine.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 11:11 pm (UTC)Seriously -- photography would be the thing I could lose myself in, easily; then again, so could any number of my other interests. Wish I could multiply myself. All the extra time a person would have! (Except now I'm getting scary mental images from Watchmen, brr.)
I'd like to see Lillian's camera someday. I think it might be one of the new film-using digital cameras...? I could easily blow my entire next paycheck on one of those.
And I think you'd be a natural at serious photography. You have a good sense of composition.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 03:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 10:28 am (UTC)It's a silent Dalek. It's from a wonderful book called "The Journal of Impossible Things", that was featured in the latest episode of Doctor Who - drawn by the Doctor himself - sort of.
Lillian's camera is nice, but not that spectacular. It's a digital Kodak with a nice zoom lens. I can get the details for you if you like.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 12:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 12:51 am (UTC)I'm now watching Season One of Doctor Who, in order, and I just came up against "Dalek." Honest, tho', that's now why I shut off the player and headed out the door for the library....
The joy of checking out someone else's camera in person is just that: the joy of handling it and ooo-aahhing it. hee
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 01:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 01:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 12:58 pm (UTC)And Van Statten is one of my favourite DW villains.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 08:23 pm (UTC)I was thinking the same thing. I gave it a try with the sound on... and it was fine. Wonder what the differences might be between this episode and the ones that I couldn't bear to listen to? Only one Dalek? A different sort of Dalek speaking?
That was the first episode where one starts to realize the scope and depth of the stories on the show.
Yes!! I see why you claim it as your favorite of the first season. The Doctor went through an incredible range of emotions. It truly scared me when he, at first sight of the Dalek, was terrified. I think the actor can be proud of his role in the Doctor Who spectrum, indeed.
And Van Statten is one of my favourite DW villains.
Okay, he was reprehensible. And he was clearly supposed to be someone (or an amalgamation of someones) seen in news photos now and then. He had that generic hot-shot look.
Again, however, this show follows the general BBC tradition (I cite MI-5 as well) of having utterly horrendous American accents. Sorry, but it jarred me to hear Diana Goddard's name pronounced with the stress on the second syllable -- nobody American would say it any other way than "Godd-drd." Little things, hm?
I found this episode quite delightful. If I watch it again, I may go the subtitles route, however, because it did begin to get to me by the end. The episode was worth it.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 08:26 pm (UTC)Good! Strange, but good.
I see why you claim it as your favorite of the first season.
Not quite. My favourite is "The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances", and I also love "Boom Town", "The Parting of the Ways" and "Father's Day". But "Dalek" is right up there with them.
this show follows the general BBC tradition (I cite MI-5 as well) of having utterly horrendous American accents.
Heh - yes. But American actors do British accents just as badly! Everyone mangles other nation's accents.