I suspect it is blown up out of context. And in all likelihood, Barrowman probably thought some of these comments were 'off the record'.
I think generally there should be more responsibility in journalism - and less sensationalism. It could be that the reporter was taking advantage of Barrowman's love of talking.
I don't think it's the duty of a popular entertainer to watch what he says, just as it's not the duty of a novelist, poet, singer, or playwright.
I guess we're agreeing here that it's a matter of context. I would add that it's a matter of intent, too.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2007-02-19 04:30 pm (UTC)I think generally there should be more responsibility in journalism - and less sensationalism. It could be that the reporter was taking advantage of Barrowman's love of talking.
I don't think it's the duty of a popular entertainer to watch what he says, just as it's not the duty of a novelist, poet, singer, or playwright.
I guess we're agreeing here that it's a matter of context. I would add that it's a matter of intent, too.