Date: 2007-02-19 04:25 pm (UTC)
ext_24830: (Default)
I agree to an extent with both these statments.

The magazine DID have a responsibility not to print comments that might have been innapropriate, but I think John should be a little more aware of some of things he says.

I adore his cheekiness, I adore his tounge in cheekedness and I wasn't in the interview, so maybe the interviewer had no problem with it, but my point remains that one does not need to share every tidbit of one's personal life.

OTOH, as has been pointed out it IS the Sun reporting this so the whole thing could be completely out of context.

I guess all Im saying is I see both sides of it. :) (Which I could have just said and not been so long winded)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

fajrdrako: (Default)
fajrdrako

October 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
151617181920 21
22 232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 3rd, 2025 12:01 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios