Seems to me its fair for anyone to say anything he wants to for a print interview - then its up to the interviewer, or their editor, to judge what is appropriate for any given publication.
Definitely Barrowman is a man for the TMI, but I don't think he should start trying to censor himself - and as far as I can tell, his comments on television and radio have always been appropriate to the venue and the audience. He didn't make the same kinds of comments on the religious show as he did on Jonathan Ross, for example, and his stint as fin-in CJ for Elaine Paige was quite different from his style on "Buzzcocks". He's a man who plays to his audience. I think perhaps he was counting on more discretion from the writer of that article than he actually got.
And though "Doctor Who Magazine" does generally try to aviod sexual content, it isn't aimed at kids - that's "Doctor Who Adventures".
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2007-02-19 04:21 pm (UTC)Definitely Barrowman is a man for the TMI, but I don't think he should start trying to censor himself - and as far as I can tell, his comments on television and radio have always been appropriate to the venue and the audience. He didn't make the same kinds of comments on the religious show as he did on Jonathan Ross, for example, and his stint as fin-in CJ for Elaine Paige was quite different from his style on "Buzzcocks". He's a man who plays to his audience. I think perhaps he was counting on more discretion from the writer of that article than he actually got.
And though "Doctor Who Magazine" does generally try to aviod sexual content, it isn't aimed at kids - that's "Doctor Who Adventures".