Shopping...
Dec. 16th, 2005 10:05 amFrom the Fannish Five for today:
What 5 characters would you like to go shopping with and what would you be shopping for?
This is a trick question because I don't much like to go shopping under any circumstances - except maybe one. The answer to the second part, then, is easy: we'd be shopping for Christmas presents.
And the people it would be fun to shop with would be the ones who liked quirky, unusual objects for imaginative (and sometimes practical) reasons. At first I thought I'd have to rule out men, because they aren't usually such good shoppers, then I remembered some men I've known (incuding my ex-husband) who were great shoppers, so that doesn't follow.
So, my list:
What 5 characters would you like to go shopping with and what would you be shopping for?
This is a trick question because I don't much like to go shopping under any circumstances - except maybe one. The answer to the second part, then, is easy: we'd be shopping for Christmas presents.
And the people it would be fun to shop with would be the ones who liked quirky, unusual objects for imaginative (and sometimes practical) reasons. At first I thought I'd have to rule out men, because they aren't usually such good shoppers, then I remembered some men I've known (incuding my ex-husband) who were great shoppers, so that doesn't follow.
So, my list:
- Francis Crawford, from the Dorothy Dunnett novels. There'd be many digressions and diversions but they would all be stylish, funny, and interesting. And he would make a good deal and befriend the shopkeeper besides. Afternatively, if he was in magisterial mode, it would all be over in fifteen minutes and he'd have offended everyone in our path.
- Kaylee (from Firefly), because she'd love everything.
- Cordelia Naismith Vorkosigan (from the Lois McMaster Bujold novels), because she would be enthusiastic, practical, and unusual in her responses to things. Come to think of it, accompanying Cordelia in the context of a shopping trip might be a dangerous idea. Hmm.
- Logan Echolls (from Veronica Mars) because of the clever, snide comments he'd make about things.
- LexLuthor (from Smallville) because he would be able to afford the most avant of the garde, the most artistic of art, and the really unusual devices. He would know the history of everything and even though his artistic eye isn't very good - well, it's downright odd - his viewpoint would be original. He too would have clever, snide remarks to make.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-16 04:53 pm (UTC)..... I have this mental image of Francis in a mall, now, at the edge of the food court, looking terribly offended by the base humanity before him. *giggles madly*
no subject
Date: 2005-12-16 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-16 06:47 pm (UTC)Lymond would be fun to shop with, as, I think, would be Philippa. Sock hats, anyone?
And better Lymond than his mother, unless you're partial to...ox feet, wasn't it?
accompanying Cordelia in the context of a shopping trip might be a dangerous idea.
Only if you've really pissed her off. *g*
no subject
Date: 2005-12-16 06:59 pm (UTC)Ooooh, what a vision.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-16 07:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-16 07:15 pm (UTC)Malls. Convenience stores. Rock concerts. Strip clubs.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-16 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-16 07:30 pm (UTC)At a rock concert?
At a stockholder's meeting?
At a rave?
no subject
Date: 2005-12-16 07:32 pm (UTC)Philippa would be great to shop with, as would Kate. As for Lymond's mother... you'd end up holding all the parcels, and you'd have to talk her out of buying stuff. But everyone would have fun.
Only if you've really pissed her off. *g*
Well, I haven't kidnapped her embryonic son lately, so I guess I'd be okay.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-16 07:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-16 07:35 pm (UTC)*whimpers*
I did not need the image of Lymond in parachute pants.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-16 07:45 pm (UTC)Picture Lymond in Toys R Us. Or a really upscale fashion shop. Or an electronics store.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-16 07:46 pm (UTC)LOL. That notion gives even me some trouble.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-16 07:47 pm (UTC)Lymond being Lymond, these things are not mutually exclusive. He'd probably join them on the stage.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-16 07:48 pm (UTC)Excuse me, I'm going to go cry into my tea.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-16 07:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-16 09:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-16 09:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-17 01:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-17 01:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-17 01:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-17 03:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-17 03:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-17 03:50 am (UTC)Hmm.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-17 03:50 am (UTC)