A few days ago I was talking about languages here and now found an article in
The Economist about that very subject: whether some languages are more difficult than others to learn, and, if so, which ones. And the general question of comparing them.
Tongue twisters: In search of the world’s hardest language. This goes a little beyond the Mario Pei sorts of things I read in my student days. Good quotes from it:
- "spelling is ancillary to a language’s real complexity; English is a relatively simple language, absurdly spelled."
- "German has three genders, seemingly so random that Mark Twain wondered why 'a young lady has no sex, but a turnip has'. (Mädchen is neuter, whereas Steckrübe is feminine.)"
- "Mandarin, the biggest language in the Chinese family, has four tones, so that what sounds just like 'ma' in English has four distinct sounds, and meanings.... Cantonese has six tones, and Min Chinese dialects seven or eight. One tone can also affect neighbouring tones' pronunciation through a series of complex rules.
- "!Xóõ, spoken by just a few thousand, mostly in Botswana, has a blistering array of unusual sounds. Its vowels include plain, pharyngealised, strident and breathy, and they carry four tones. It has five basic clicks and 17 accompanying ones. The leading expert on the !Xóõ, Tony Traill, developed a lump on his larynx from learning to make their sounds. Further research showed that adult !Xóõ-speakers had the same lump (children had not developed it yet)."
- "Latin’s six cases cower in comparison with Estonian’s 14, which include inessive, elative, adessive, abessive, and the system is riddled with irregularities and exceptions."
- "To the extent that genders are idiosyncratic, they are hard to learn. Bora, spoken in Peru, has more than 350 of them."
- "Take 'we'. In Kwaio, spoken in the Solomon Islands, 'we' has two forms: “me and you” and 'me and someone else (but not you)'. And Kwaio has not just singular and plural, but dual and paucal too. While English gets by with just 'we', Kwaio has 'we two', 'we few' and 'we many'. [Presumably each taking a different verb in each conjugation?] Each of these has two forms, one inclusive ('we including you') and one exclusive."
- [In] Berik, a language of New Guinea.... Verbs have endings, often obligatory, that tell what time of day something happened; telbener means '[he] drinks in the evening'. Where verbs take objects, an ending will tell their size: kitobana means 'gives three large objects to a man in the sunlight.'
Then the article talks about the Universalists like Chosmky, who belive with Noam Chomsky, that there are basic patterns for all languages because of the way the mind works, and those who belive like Benjamin Lee Whorf, who believe that language conditions the way we see the world. I am a confirmed Chomskyite, though I hope no one tries to make me prove it. And I'd rather not even try to master a language that will put a lump on my larynx.
The article concludes that the most difficult language in the world is Tuyuca, and I'm not going to try to describe it, because even just reading about it has made my head spin. It sounds impossible, but I suppose, if you learn to speak it as an infant, it's a breeze.
Maybe.