It was Sandi's birthday. We had dinner at Montana's and then went to see
Timeline at South Keys - me, Sandi, Pat, Lyn and Beulah.
The review in
The Ottawa Citizen was so bad it was funny. It said that Paul Walker as Chris Johnston was remarkable only in his ability to walk around with the nervous, clueless express an actor gets when trying to remember his lines. It also said the history was terrible.
Okay, the history was terrible. Chris Johnston won't win the Academy Award but he wasn't so bad. Frances O'Connor as Kate wasn't too remarkable either, but she was fine, and besides, they weren't the ones I was watching. I was enjoying the looks and performances of Gerard Butler and Anna Friel, both of whom I like - a lot. Especially Anna Friel. Haven't seen her for a while. I had a major crush on her for a while. She is gorgeous, and I like her acting style.
The movie is a typical Michael Crichton story: don't expect to think too much. (And if you do, you'll notice the bad science and worse history, so it's better not to.) My favourite cringeworthy moment was when they translated the Latin "magister" as "scientist". Right.
I liked the way the movie combined science fiction and medieval history. Basically it's about the (failed) attempt to invent the transport beam, which results in unintended time travel. They were supposed to be in 14th century France and it didn't look in the least like any part of France I ever saw. "It looks as if it was filmed around here," I thought. "If not Ontario, maybe Quebec." Yes: It turned out to have been filmed in Quebec, and most of the many French names in the credits were familiar French-Canadian names.
It reminded me of
Reign of Fire and not just because Gerard Butler was in it. Similar visuals.
I particularly liked the resolution of the plot - the end of the story.