I'd say those are all very good points, and I hope the law considers them.
I'm all for protecting children, but this is so much a different situation - one that offers no harm to children at all - that I think the connection doesn't even exist.
Maybe it has to be tested in law to prove that, to set the precedent - in a good way, towards freedom of speech and artistic expression rather than away from it.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-26 08:13 pm (UTC)I'm all for protecting children, but this is so much a different situation - one that offers no harm to children at all - that I think the connection doesn't even exist.
Maybe it has to be tested in law to prove that, to set the precedent - in a good way, towards freedom of speech and artistic expression rather than away from it.